- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:54:55 +0000
- To: Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
- Cc: "Svensson, Lars" <L.Svensson@dnb.de>, Laura Dawson <Laura.Dawson@bowker.com>, "lazarus@lazaruscorporation.co.uk" <lazarus@lazaruscorporation.co.uk>, "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 21 November 2013 14:50, Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org> wrote: > Yes, you are right - but the URN schemes are, at least in my opinion, kind of a dead branch of the URI space, because they cannot be upgraded to be dereferenceable. Never say never, some people had URN resolution via their HTTP proxies back in '98, http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june98/06powell.html ... But you're right, it didn't catch on. And yes, I like the idea of adding a few more http://schema.org/sameAs examples for well known ID/authority services. Suggestions welcomed, Dan > Martin > > > On Nov 21, 2013, at 3:38 PM, Svensson, Lars wrote: > >>> The difference to ISBN is that for ISBN codes, there is no canonical URI >>> schema defined (at least to my knowledge). >> >> There is urn:isbn (RFC 3187 [1]) which allows you to mask any ISBN in a URI. >> >> [1] http://www.iana.org/go/rfc3187 >> >> /Lars >> >> > > -------------------------------------------------------- > martin hepp > e-business & web science research group > universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen > > e-mail: hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org > phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217 > fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620 > www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group) > http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal) > skype: mfhepp > twitter: mfhepp > > Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data! > ================================================================= > * Project Main Page: http://purl.org/goodrelations/ > > > >
Received on Thursday, 21 November 2013 14:55:23 UTC