- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 16:23:11 +0000
- To: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
- Cc: Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>, Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>, Justin Boyan <jaboyan@google.com>, Web Schemas TF <public-vocabs@w3.org>, Phil Barker <phil.barker@hw.ac.uk>
On 22 November 2013 16:17, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 ... BUT ... please, please, please.... in the description of Topic... note the difference between a Thing, and a Topic. In fact, give 1 example showing Thing and Topic being used hand in hand. OK, it's certainly examples time. I think lurking beneath the lack of strong consensus on a type name are different expectations about the scope of this mechanism. I'll try to collect some examples but please also can people share some brief examples in this thread? BTW on the scope question (and in favour of the 'code' view of things), it's worth pointing out the W3C Data Cube work, which uses SKOS for various kinds of coded list in statistical data --- e.g. gender, geo etc. See http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-data-cube/#schemes Dan
Received on Friday, 22 November 2013 16:23:40 UTC