- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 09:16:32 -0800
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>, "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Can't help you with your question, but a quick glance turned up this: Add property 'area', range 'Place' with description "the area within which users can expect to reach the BoradcastService" Lately we've been trying to avoid the addition of general terms (like "area") when they're actually representing something more specific (like "area within which users can expect to reach the broadcast service"). So before moving this proposal in, we might want to look at it with that in mind. I would suggest "broadcastArea" as a better term, but essentially I mainly care that the general term "area" not be used for this specific concept. kc On 11/7/13 8:59 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > I'm having trouble figuring out the status of the TVRadio proposal at > http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/TVRadioSchema > > The page itself says "Candidate". > > The proposals page at > http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/SchemaDotOrgProposals > says "Accepted; published in next version" > > The changes page > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webschema/raw-file/default/schema.org/drafts/changes.html > lists it under "Changes Pending" "For Edition 1.0" which was announced > on 7 June 2012 in > http://blog.schema.org/2012/06/semtech-rdfa-microdata-and-more.html > > The listing of schema.org types at http://schema.org/docs/full.html does > not include the new types from the proposal. > > > Maybe this all can be explained because schema.org is not at Edition 1.0 > yet, but it has been 17 months since the announcement, which is a rather > long time. > > Any information would be appreciated. > > > Peter F. Patel-Schneider > > > -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet
Received on Thursday, 7 November 2013 17:17:01 UTC