Re: Accessibility for Re: Updated Wiki to cover proposal

I note that everything now has a prefix accessibility eg  
accessibilityFeature. Does this solve the problem with accessHazard ie  
is accessibilityHazard going to be OK??


On 18/11/2013, at 7:26 PM, Charles McCathie Nevile wrote:

> Oh. The page in question is
> and it covers the
> accessibility proposal for I'll annotate it a little  
> further
> in the next few hours.
> And the values expected are meant to be enumerated - i.e. the valid  
> values are the list of values as maintained in the wiki. Is there a  
> better Datatype for that than "Text"?
> cheers
> Chaals
> On Mon, 18 Nov 2013 10:44:59 +0800, Charles McCathie Nevile
> <> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I updated the Wiki page for the proposal, to separate out the  
>> things that we hope to adopt in this week.
>> Note that I did a really rushed job (hopefully I'll have time to  
>> improve on it when I am back from the dentist later), and that I  
>> haven't yet done the work of annotating more clearly what we expect  
>> to happen with the rest of the proposal.
>> But I figured it was important to communicate at least this much  
>> instead of getting the whole message right before saying anything.
>> cheers
>> Chaals
> -- 
> Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office,  
> Yandex
>         Find more at

Received on Tuesday, 19 November 2013 00:08:17 UTC