- From: Dan Scott <dan@coffeecode.net>
- Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 14:26:51 -0500
- To: public-vocabs@w3.org
I've reported these problems with the schema.org docs over the past few months, but they're still present in the latest 1.0d update. So I'll try to consolidate them and hopefully they can be dealt with in a single pass for 1.0e! * http://schema.org/ItemAvailability - typo in "availablity": "A list of possible product availablity options." should be "A list of possible product availability options." * http://schema.org/citation - invalid note in docs. The description says "NOTE: Candidate for promotion to ScholarlyArticle." when in fact the property was promoted from ScholarlyArticle to CreativeWork. The same problematic note appears in every inline description of "citation" in CreativeWork and all of its children. * http://www.schema.org/docs/schema_org_rdfa.html still has no encoding declaration in the <head> element or HTTP header. This can cause difficulties for parsers. * "antagonym" still appears in the descriptions of http://schema.org/AcceptAction and other actions. This is being tracked at https://www.w3.org/2011/webschema/track/issues/24 but was missed in the 1.0d update. If there is some other process I can follow to help improve the schema.org documentation, please point me at it! Thanks, Dan
Received on Tuesday, 26 November 2013 19:27:22 UTC