Re: Proposal to include ISNI

Martin, Iıll see who I can contact about this! Youıre right - itıs an
identifier thatıs been around forever; might as well bring it into the
21st century!

On 11/21/13, 10:43 AM, "Martin Hepp" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
wrote:

>Dear Lars:
>
>Seeing your affiliation: It would be great if Dun & Bradstreet implemented
>
>- a canonical URI schema for DUNs
>and ideally
>- return HTML via HTTP for these URIs
>and even better
>- added at least basic schema.org markup to those pages.
>
>We already have a property for DUNs in schema.org (imported from
>GoodRelations), see
>
>    http://schema.org/duns
>
>This would allow the DUNs and your company to expand the strong position
>in the field of identifiers for commercial entities into the data
>marketing age. If you need more input on why this may be worthwhile,
>contact me by email, please.
>
>Best
>
>Martin
>
>
>On Nov 21, 2013, at 3:38 PM, Svensson, Lars wrote:
>
>>> The difference to ISBN is that for ISBN codes, there is no canonical
>>>URI
>>> schema defined (at least to my knowledge).
>> 
>> There is urn:isbn (RFC 3187 [1]) which allows you to mask any ISBN in a
>>URI.
>> 
>> [1] http://www.iana.org/go/rfc3187
>> 
>> /Lars
>> 
>> 
>
>--------------------------------------------------------
>martin hepp
>e-business & web science research group
>universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen
>
>e-mail:  hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
>phone:   +49-(0)89-6004-4217
>fax:     +49-(0)89-6004-4620
>www:     http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
>         http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
>skype:   mfhepp 
>twitter: mfhepp
>
>Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data!
>=================================================================
>* Project Main Page: http://purl.org/goodrelations/
>
>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 21 November 2013 15:45:45 UTC