- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 13:22:53 -0800
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, Liddy Nevile <liddy@sunriseresearch.org>
- CC: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, "<public-vocabs@w3.org>" <public-vocabs@w3.org>, "a11y-metadata-project@googlegroups.com" <a11y-metadata-project@googlegroups.com>
You mean like "emergency" is likely to make you think of "A specific branch of medical science that [...] deals with the evaluation and initial treatment of medical conditions caused by trauma or sudden illness."? I think that the non-general purpose name genie is firmly out of the schema.org bottle. peter On 11/19/2013 06:48 AM, Dan Brickley wrote: > On 19 November 2013 00:07, Liddy Nevile <liddy@sunriseresearch.org> wrote: >> I note that everything now has a prefix accessibility eg >> accessibilityFeature. Does this solve the problem with accessHazard ie is accessibilityHazard going to be OK?? > There was a problem having a property called 'accessControl'. In a > purely accessibility-oriented setting that might be intuitive. However > schema.org is a general purpose flat namespace, and so the phrase > "access control" is likely to make people think more of passwords, > openid, etc. > > Dan >
Received on Tuesday, 19 November 2013 21:23:24 UTC