- From: Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 23:21:33 +0100
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-vocabs@w3.org
The difference is that in the case of ISNI, the canonical URI schema is provided by the body maintaining the ISNI identifiers.
For ISBNs, there is no authoritative URI pattern available, despite the fact that there exist several services that return representations for (typically a subset of) ISBNs.
Second, there has been a history of not deprecating / removing existing elements from schema.org, so even if your argument was right, the case for ISBN would be different, since it already exists in schema.org.
Martin
On Nov 20, 2013, at 11:15 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> Hmm.
>
> What then is
>
> http://books.google.com/books?vid=ISBN*{ISBN Number}
>
> This seems to be as good as, for example, Freebase URLs.
>
> peter
>
> *
> On 11/20/2013 01:46 PM, Martin Hepp wrote:
>> Hi Laura,
> [...]
>> The difference to ISBN is that for ISBN codes, there is no canonical URI schema defined (at least to my knowledge).
>>
>> Martin
>>
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------
martin hepp
e-business & web science research group
universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen
e-mail: hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217
fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620
www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
skype: mfhepp
twitter: mfhepp
Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data!
=================================================================
* Project Main Page: http://purl.org/goodrelations/
Received on Wednesday, 20 November 2013 22:21:57 UTC