public-prov-wg@w3.org from November 2011 by date

Wednesday, 30 November 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-91 (what-to-define-for-location): what should we define under the heading 'location' [Conceptual Model] Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-134: Non-Human Agent vs. Human Agent [Data Model] Reza B'Far (Oracle)
Re: PROV-ISSUE-149 (revision-asserter): Why does revision record include an asserter? [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-149 (revision-asserter): Why does revision record include an asserter? [Data Model] Simon Miles
Re: PROV-ISSUE-161 (TLebo): Quotation: quoting agent should be done with Accounts [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-160 (TLebo): Redundant terminology in new wasDerivedFrom classification scheme [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-158 (TLebo): Cite temporal ordering constraint [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-156 (TLebo): information flow ordering record - no temporal constraints? [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-149 (revision-asserter): Why does revision record include an asserter? [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-134: Non-Human Agent vs. Human Agent [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-130 (YolandaGil): Definition and examples of "agent" should be clarified in Provenance Data Model (PROV-DM) Draft [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-129 (YolandaGil): Definitions of "Activity"/"Event"/"ProcessExecution" should be more crisp and differentiable in Provenance Data Model (PROV-DM) Draft [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-127: Constraint id= participation (PROV DM and PROV ontology) [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-113: wasScheduledAfter is transitive [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-100 (Entity definition): Section 5.2.1 Entity [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: ISSUE-23: Create definition of involve to replace Use Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-146 (Tlebo): wasAttributeTo [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-143 (Tlebo): Qualifiers - why does order matter? [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-140 (entity-qualifier-syntax): ASN uses different syntax for entity attributes and qualifiers Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-126: Section 5.3.3.2 "Process Execution Independent Derivation Expression." [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-125: derivation-attributes constraint (PROV-DM and PROV-O) [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-122: Constraint on wasGeneratedBy (PROV-DM and PROV-OM) [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-105: 5.3.1 Generation (current version of the conceptual model document) [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-101 (Conceptual Model): Section 5.2.2 ProcessExecution (conceptual model document review) [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-94 (pe-attributes): are process executions characterized in the same way as entities? [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-91 (what-to-define-for-location): what should we define under the heading 'location' [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-82 (pidm-event): Should we introduce a notion of event in the data model? [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-81 (identity-clash-scope): In a given scope, are entities with same identifier but different attributes legal? [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-71 (Conceptual Model draft): Section 3.2 of Conceptual Model draft (Content and Editing) [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-69 (Process Execution): Process execution occurs over a "continuous time interval"? [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-64 (definition-use): definition of use [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-51 (asserter-def): Asserter needs to be defined with respect to a provenance container/account [Conceptual Model] Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-51 (asserter-def): Asserter needs to be defined with respect to a provenance container/account [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-50 (Ordering of Process): Defintion for Ordering of Process [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-49 (Participation): Suggested definition for Participation [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-41 (distinct-roles): Distinct roles should be SHOULD and not MUST [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-48 (Provenance Concept: Revision): Revision should be a class and not a property [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 01 Dec 2011 Luc Moreau

Tuesday, 29 November 2011

Re: PROV-O comments Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: PROV-O comments Simon Miles
Re: PROV-O comments Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: PROV-O comments Satya Sahoo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-124: Constraints on Used Relation (PROV-DM and PROV-OM) [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-124: Constraints on Used Relation (PROV-DM and PROV-OM) [Conceptual Model] Paolo Missier

Monday, 28 November 2011

Re: Plan to progress PROV-AQ to FPWD Graham Klyne

Tuesday, 29 November 2011

Re: PROV-O comments Luc Moreau

Monday, 28 November 2011

Re: Plan to progress PROV-AQ to FPWD Luc Moreau
PROV-O telcon (Nov 28) Satya Sahoo
RE: PROV-DM derivation concerns arising from my primer review Myers, Jim
Re: PROV-DM derivation concerns arising from my primer review Stian Soiland-Reyes

Saturday, 26 November 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-166 (TLebo): Sufficient _what_? Jim McCusker

Friday, 25 November 2011

Re: Examoples in primer Paolo Missier
Re: PROV-DM derivation concerns arising from my primer review Graham Klyne
Re: Plan to progress PROV-AQ to FPWD Luc Moreau
Re: Plan to progress PROV-AQ to FPWD Graham Klyne
Examoples in primer (was: Comments on the Primer) Graham Klyne
Re: Plan to progress PROV-AQ to FPWD Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-DM derivation concerns arising from my primer review Graham Klyne
Re: Plan to progress PROV-AQ to FPWD Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-DM derivation concerns arising from my primer review Simon Miles
Re: PROV-ISSUE-175 (TLebo): 4.3 Provenance service discovery [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne
Plan to progress PROV-AQ to FPWD Graham Klyne

Thursday, 24 November 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-165 (TLebo): Enforcing non-contradictory provenance. [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Graham Klyne
Re: Primer first draft for review Graham Klyne
Re: rel links in HTTP and HTML Graham Klyne

Friday, 25 November 2011

Thursday, 24 November 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-166 (TLebo): Sufficient _what_? Graham Klyne

Friday, 25 November 2011

Re: rel links in HTTP and HTML Graham Klyne

Thursday, 24 November 2011

Re: PROV-DM derivation concerns arising from my primer review Graham Klyne
CFP: Eighth International Conference on Data Integration in the Life Sciences (DILS 2012) Satya Sahoo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-164 (TLebo): pre-determined versus determined [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Stephan Zednik
Re: PROV-O comments Khalid Belhajjame
PROV-O comments Simon Miles
Re: Comments on the Primer Paolo Missier
Comments on the Primer Khalid Belhajjame
Re: PROV-DM derivation concerns arising from my primer review Stian Soiland-Reyes

Wednesday, 23 November 2011

Thursday, 24 November 2011

Re: rel links in HTTP and HTML Stian Soiland-Reyes

Wednesday, 23 November 2011

PROV-ISSUE-175 (TLebo): 4.3 Provenance service discovery [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-174 (TLebo): Replace http://example.info with http://example.{com,org} [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-173 (TLebo): representations versus formats [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-172 (TLebo): purpose of prov:hasAnchor [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-171 (TLebo): HTTP in RDF [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-170 (TLebo): Resources are "represented", not "presented" [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-169 (TLebo): Motivating provenance services in PAQ [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-168 (TLebo): HTTP POSTing a provenance URI to an originating source [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] Graham Klyne
rel links in HTTP and HTML Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-DM derivation concerns arising from my primer review Simon Miles
Re: Primer first draft for review Simon Miles
Re: Quotation example Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] Stian Soiland-Reyes
PROV-ISSUE-167 (TLebo): What is a "normal web resource"? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-166 (TLebo): Sufficient _what_? Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-165 (TLebo): Enforcing non-contradictory provenance. [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: Primer first draft for review Simon Miles
PROV-ISSUE-164 (TLebo): pre-determined versus determined [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-163 (TLebo): What does provenance information describe? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-162 (TLebo): Entities can only be web resources? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] Jim McCusker
PROV-WG: Telecon Agenda Nov 23, 2012 Paul Groth
Re: PROV-O telcon Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] Paolo Missier
Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] Paolo Missier

Tuesday, 22 November 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-151 (TLebo): Rename wasQuoteOf to wasQuotedFrom [Data Model] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-161 (TLebo): Quotation: quoting agent should be done with Accounts [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-124: Constraints on Used Relation (PROV-DM and PROV-OM) [Conceptual Model] Timothy Lebo
Re: Quotation example Timothy Lebo
PROV-ISSUE-161 (TLebo): Quotation: quoting agent should be done with Accounts [Data Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Timothy Lebo
Re: prov-o terms Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-150: question on formal semantics of role in wasGeneratedBy relation [Formal Semantics] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] Jim McCusker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-O telcon Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-O telcon Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-143 (Tlebo): Qualifiers - why does order matter? [Data Model] Paolo Missier
Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-160 (TLebo): Redundant terminology in new wasDerivedFrom classification scheme [Data Model] Paolo Missier
Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] Paolo Missier

Monday, 21 November 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] Simon Miles
Re: A proposal for modeling agents Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-149 (revision-asserter): Why does revision record include an asserter? [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-149 (revision-asserter): Why does revision record include an asserter? [Data Model] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-149 (revision-asserter): Why does revision record include an asserter? [Data Model] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-160 (TLebo): Redundant terminology in new wasDerivedFrom classification scheme [Data Model] Timothy Lebo
PROV-ISSUE-160 (TLebo): Redundant terminology in new wasDerivedFrom classification scheme [Data Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: A proposal for modeling agents Stephan Zednik
Re: PROV-ISSUE-157 (TLebo): wasInformedBy's non-transitivity Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-156 (TLebo): information flow ordering record - no temporal constraints? [Data Model] Luc Moreau
PROV-ISSUE-159 (Tlebo): note on how PROV-O inteprets DM's "type" and "subtype" [Ontology] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-148 (WasScheduledAfter): wasScheduledAfter definition is difficult to understand Timothy Lebo
PROV-ISSUE-158 (TLebo): Cite temporal ordering constraint [Data Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-157 (TLebo): wasInformedBy's non-transitivity Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-156 (TLebo): information flow ordering record - no temporal constraints? [Data Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: Leveraging OBE for PROV-O Accounts Timothy Lebo
Re: Ontology telcon Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-155 (prov-o-pre-fpwd): general comments on prov-o document [Formal Semantics] Luc Moreau
PROV-ISSUE-155 (prov-o-pre-fpwd): general comments on prov-o document [Formal Semantics] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Ontology telcon Satya Sahoo

Saturday, 19 November 2011

SPARQL endpoint discovery - two suggestions Graham Klyne
Re: Comments on PAQ Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-DM derivation concerns arising from my primer review Graham Klyne
SPARQL endpoint discovery (was: Comments on PAQ) Graham Klyne
PROV-ISSUE-154 (RDF-provenance-service-uri): Include provenance-service-uri for RDF resources [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker

Friday, 18 November 2011

Re: Primer first draft for review Graham Klyne
Comments on PAQ Cresswell, Stephen
PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-152 (QualifiedInvolvement): will the QualifiedInvolvement approach work for other relations? [Ontology] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker

Thursday, 17 November 2011

Re: PAQ tidying notes Graham Klyne
PAQ tidying notes Simon Miles
Re: PROV-ISSUE-141 (agent-attributes): Is there a way to associate attributes (e.g. a name) with an agent in ASN? [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: Primer first draft for review Simon Miles
Re: PROV-DM derivation concerns arising from my primer review Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-DM derivation concerns arising from my primer review Luc Moreau
PROV-DM derivation concerns arising from my primer review Graham Klyne
Re: Primer first draft for review Graham Klyne

Wednesday, 16 November 2011

Re: PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 17 Nov 2011 Daniel Garijo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-126: Section 5.3.3.2 "Process Execution Independent Derivation Expression." [Data Model] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-143 (Tlebo): Qualifiers - why does order matter? [Data Model] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-143 (Tlebo): Qualifiers - why does order matter? [Data Model] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-147 (Replace recipe): Change the name if "Recipe" [Data Model] Timothy Lebo
PROV-ISSUE-151 (TLebo): Rename wasQuoteOf to wasQuotedFrom [Data Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: Qualified Involvements proposal Timothy Lebo
Re: Qualified Involvements proposal Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-125: derivation-attributes constraint (PROV-DM and PROV-O) [Data Model] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-124: Constraints on Used Relation (PROV-DM and PROV-OM) [Conceptual Model] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-105: 5.3.1 Generation (current version of the conceptual model document) [Conceptual Model] Timothy Lebo
CFP: 4th International Provenance and Annotation Workshop (IPAW'2012) Paul Groth
Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Simon Miles
Re: Quotation example Paul Groth
Quotation example Timothy Lebo
Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-WG Reminder: Review PAQ before FPWD vote Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-WG Reminder: Review PAQ before FPWD vote Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-WG Reminder: Review PAQ before FPWD vote Graham Klyne
PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 17 Nov 2011 Luc Moreau

Tuesday, 15 November 2011

Review of PROV-O for FPWD vote Satya Sahoo
Updates on issues raised for PROV-O Satya Sahoo
RE: PROV-WG Reminder: Review PAQ before FPWD vote Luc Moreau
Re: prov-o terms Satya Sahoo
Re: PROV-WG Reminder: Review PAQ before FPWD vote Paul Groth
Re: PROV-WG Reminder: Review PAQ before FPWD vote Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-WG Reminder: Review PAQ before FPWD vote Paul Groth
Re: PROV-WG Reminder: Review PAQ before FPWD vote Luc Moreau
Primer first draft for review Simon Miles
Re: PROV-WG Reminder: Review PAQ before FPWD vote Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-WG Reminder: Review PAQ before FPWD vote Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-135 (collection-names): Collection relations have confusing names [Data Model] Paolo Missier
prov-o terms Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-WG Reminder: Review PAQ before FPWD vote Luc Moreau

Monday, 14 November 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Graham Klyne
PROV-ISSUE-150: question on formal semantics of role in wasGeneratedBy relation [Formal Semantics] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-WG: Minutes from Nov 10, 2011 Telecon Paul Groth
PROV-WG Reminder: Review PAQ before FPWD vote Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: A proposal for modeling agents Stephan Zednik
PROV-O telcon Satya Sahoo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] Stian Soiland-Reyes

Sunday, 13 November 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Simon Miles
Re: A proposal for modeling agents Stephan Zednik
Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Simon Miles
Re: PROV-ISSUE-149 (revision-asserter): Why does revision record include an asserter? [Data Model] Simon Miles
Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Graham Klyne
Re: A proposal for modeling agents Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] Graham Klyne

Friday, 11 November 2011

Thursday, 10 November 2011

Semantics Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Jim McCusker
Re: A proposal for modeling agents Daniel Garijo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Paolo Missier
RE: A proposal for modeling agents Myers, Jim
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Luc Moreau
A proposal for modeling agents Yolanda Gil
Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Leveraging OBE for PROV-O Accounts Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Graham Klyne
Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Graham Klyne
Re: prov-dm qualifier: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-144 (Tlebo): how is "reserved attribute 'type'" related to rdf:type? [Data Model] Graham Klyne
PROV-ISSUE-148 (WasScheduledAfter): wasScheduledAfter definition is difficult to understand Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-WG scribe needed Paul Groth
Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Simon Miles
Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Simon Miles
Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Luc Moreau
Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Luc Moreau
PAQ updates Graham Klyne
Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Simon Miles

Wednesday, 9 November 2011

Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Luc Moreau
Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Simon Miles
Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Simon Miles
Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Paul Groth
Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Simon Miles
Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Luc Moreau
Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Paul Groth
Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Simon Miles
Re: prov-dm qualifier: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Reza B'Far (Oracle)
Re: prov-dm qualifier: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Ryan Golden
Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Stephan Zednik
RE: prov-dm qualifier: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Myers, Jim
Re: prov-dm qualifier: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Stephan Zednik
Re: prov-dm qualifier: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Satya Sahoo
Re: prov-dm qualifier: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Simon Miles
Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Khalid Belhajjame
Re: prov-dm qualifier: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Paolo Missier
PROV-WG: Telecon Agenda Nov. 10 2011 Paul Groth
Re: Reminder: Please fill out F2F Poll Paul Groth
Reminder: Please fill out F2F Poll Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Paul Groth
Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Luc Moreau
Re: prov-dm qualifier: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Luc Moreau
New URL for PROV-O ontology Timothy Lebo

Tuesday, 8 November 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: mercurial repository heads Timothy Lebo
Re: mercurial repository heads Luc Moreau
Re: mercurial repository heads Timothy Lebo
Re: mercurial repository heads Timothy Lebo
Re: mercurial repository heads Satya Sahoo
mercurial repository heads Timothy Lebo
Re: Primer new plan Simon Miles
Primer new plan Simon Miles
Re: PROV-ISSUE-101 (Conceptual Model): Section 5.2.2 ProcessExecution (conceptual model document review) [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-101 (Conceptual Model): Section 5.2.2 ProcessExecution (conceptual model document review) [Conceptual Model] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-126: Section 5.3.3.2 "Process Execution Independent Derivation Expression." [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Jim McCusker
Re: feedback on Qualified Involvements wiki page Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-144 (Tlebo): how is "reserved attribute 'type'" related to rdf:type? [Data Model] Timothy Lebo
Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Daniel Garijo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Luc Moreau
Fwd: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Daniel Garijo
Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Luc Moreau
Re: prov-dm qualifier: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Daniel Garijo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Paolo Missier
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Paolo Missier
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Paolo Missier
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Jim McCusker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Jim McCusker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-143 (Tlebo): Qualifiers - why does order matter? [Data Model] Stian Soiland-Reyes

Monday, 7 November 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-147 (Replace recipe): Change the name if "Recipe" [Data Model] Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: PROV-ISSUE-147 (Replace recipe): Change the name if "Recipe" [Data Model] Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: PROV-O telcon Satya Sahoo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-O telcon Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Jim McCusker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-147 (Replace recipe): Change the name if "Recipe" [Data Model] Satya Sahoo
Re: PROV-O telcon Luc Moreau
prov-dm qualifier: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-143 (Tlebo): Qualifiers - why does order matter? [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: Qualified Involvements proposal Luc Moreau
Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Jim McCusker
Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Simon Miles
Re: PROV-ISSUE-147 (Replace recipe): Change the name if "Recipe" [Data Model] Jim McCusker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Paolo Missier
Re: PROV-ISSUE-147 (Replace recipe): Change the name if "Recipe" [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-147 (Replace recipe): Change the name if "Recipe" [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-147 (Replace recipe): Change the name if "Recipe" [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-147 (Replace recipe): Change the name if "Recipe" [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-O telcon Paolo Missier
Re: PROV-ISSUE-147 (Replace recipe): Change the name if "Recipe" [Data Model] Paolo Missier
Re: PROV-O telcon Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-147 (Replace recipe): Change the name if "Recipe" [Data Model] Satya Sahoo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-147 (Replace recipe): Change the name if "Recipe" [Data Model] Stephan Zednik
Re: PROV-ISSUE-147 (Replace recipe): Change the name if "Recipe" [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-147 (Replace recipe): Change the name if "Recipe" [Data Model] Satya Sahoo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-147 (Replace recipe): Change the name if "Recipe" [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-147 (Replace recipe): Change the name if "Recipe" [Data Model] Jim McCusker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-147 (Replace recipe): Change the name if "Recipe" [Data Model] Satya Sahoo
PROV-ISSUE-147 (Replace recipe): Change the name if "Recipe" [Data Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: PROV-O telcon Daniel Garijo
Re: Thoughts in the prov primer Simon Miles
Re: PROV-ISSUE-125: derivation-attributes constraint (PROV-DM and PROV-O) [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: Qualified Involvements proposal Daniel Garijo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-124: Constraints on Used Relation (PROV-DM and PROV-OM) [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-100 (Entity definition): Section 5.2.1 Entity [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-122: Constraint on wasGeneratedBy (PROV-DM and PROV-OM) [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-105: 5.3.1 Generation (current version of the conceptual model document) [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: Qualified Involvements proposal Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-101 (Conceptual Model): Section 5.2.2 ProcessExecution (conceptual model document review) [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Luc Moreau
RE: PROV-O telcon Stephan Zednik
Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-O telcon Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] Paolo Missier
Re: PROV-ISSUE-144 (Tlebo): how is "reserved attribute 'type'" related to rdf:type? [Data Model] Paolo Missier
Re: PROV-ISSUE-143 (Tlebo): Qualifiers - why does order matter? [Data Model] Paolo Missier
Re: PROV-ISSUE-146 (Tlebo): wasAttributeTo [Data Model] Paolo Missier
Re: PROV-O telcon Tim Lebo
Re: PROV-O telcon Satya Sahoo

Sunday, 6 November 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Tim Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] Tim Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Jim McCusker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Stephan Zednik
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-O telcon Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] Timothy Lebo
Qualified Involvements proposal Timothy Lebo
PROV-O telcon Satya Sahoo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Satya Sahoo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Daniel Garijo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Paul Groth
RE: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Stephan Zednik
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Daniel Garijo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Luc Moreau
RE: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Stephan Zednik
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Jim McCusker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Luc Moreau
RE: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Stephan Zednik
F2F2 dates and locations poll: deadline Nov 16th Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Jim McCusker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Jim McCusker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Jim McCusker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] Luc Moreau
PROV-ISSUE-146 (Tlebo): wasAttributeTo [Data Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-144 (Tlebo): how is "reserved attribute 'type'" related to rdf:type? [Data Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-143 (Tlebo): Qualifiers - why does order matter? [Data Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker

Friday, 4 November 2011

Meeting minutes 2011-11-03 Luc Moreau

Thursday, 3 November 2011

Re: Blog Post: 5 Simple Provenance Statements Graham Klyne
Re: Blog Post: 5 Simple Provenance Statements Luc Moreau
Re: prov-dm expression: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Graham Klyne
Re: Blog Post: 5 Simple Provenance Statements Graham Klyne
PROV-DM - editorial nit Graham Klyne
PROV-ISSUE-141 (agent-attributes): Is there a way to associate attributes (e.g. a name) with an agent in ASN? [Data Model] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-140 (entity-qualifier-syntax): ASN uses different syntax for entity attributes and qualifiers Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: prov-o example relations Paolo Missier
Thoughts in the prov primer Stephan Zednik

Wednesday, 2 November 2011

Re: prov-o example relations Satya Sahoo
Regrets Eric Stephan
Re: prov-dm expression: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Reza B'Far (Oracle)
Re: prov-dm attributes: two proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Daniel Garijo
Re: prov-dm expression: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Satya Sahoo
Re: prov-dm expression: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Ryan Golden
Re: prov-dm expression: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) James Cheney
Re: prov-dm expression: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Satya Sahoo
RE: prov-dm expression: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Myers, Jim
RE: prov-dm expression: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Myers, Jim
Re: prov-dm expression: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Luc Moreau
Re: prov-dm attributes: two proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: prov-dm expression: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Paolo Missier
Re: prov-dm expression: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) James Cheney
Re: prov-dm expression: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) Luc Moreau

Tuesday, 1 November 2011

PROV-WG: Minutes October 27, 2011 Paul Groth
PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 3 Nov 2011 Luc Moreau

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 November 2011 20:07:03 UTC