- From: Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:18:11 +0000
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/153 Raised by: Graham Klyne On product: Primer Primer section: 2.7 Complementarity While I personally think the notion of complementarity described here is the more useful one, I don't think it agrees with the current PROV-DM (http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/tip/model/ProvenanceModel.html#record-complement-of). (What you describe here might be termed "characterizationOf" (of "viewOf"), which notion I see as being foundational to the way entities are related to things.) To clarify: in my reading, primer defines complementarity as an asymmetric relationship, where one characterization is subsumed by the other. But the model definition is symmetric, simply saying that the characterizations overlap in some sense.
Received on Friday, 18 November 2011 09:18:13 UTC