W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > November 2011

Re: PROV-DM derivation concerns arising from my primer review

From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 11:56:26 +0000
Message-ID: <EMEW3|dc37137278d6dfa9f0065cddae7a2749nAGBuW08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4EC4F66A.4090602@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Yes, Graham, that is the intent, but it's too buried in the text.
Luc

On 11/17/2011 11:31 AM, Graham Klyne wrote:
>
> == Direct derivation with unspecified action ==
>
> Is it possible to state that there is a direct derivation relation 
> between two entities by some unspecified (existentially quantified) 
> process execution?
>
> I think this is possible using expressions like 
> "wasDerivedFrom(e2,e1)".  It is stated, but I found it took some 
> digging out of the text.

-- 
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Thursday, 17 November 2011 11:57:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:04 UTC