- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 10:01:16 +0000
- To: James Cheney <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- CC: Satya Sahoo <satya.sahoo@case.edu>, Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
"inferred statement" seems quite natural to me :) #g -- On 02/11/2011 15:51, James Cheney wrote: > I suppose "statement" has a similar problem to "assertion" though - e.g. "inferred statement" sounds a little strange too (to me). > > --James > > On Nov 2, 2011, at 3:45 PM, Satya Sahoo wrote: > >> Hi, >> I like James suggestion for using "Statement" instead of either "expression" or "record". >> >> 0 (in favor of "Entity statement", "xxx statement"). >> >> Best, >> Satya >> >> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 8:01 AM, James Cheney<jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk> wrote: >> 0 - I think either "expression" or "record" is fine. "Statement" would also be fine - in my view these are closer to declarative statements than "expressions" that you'd evaluate in a programming language. "Record" might be confusing if the entities are also records, but this is true for "expression" and "statement" too. >> >> --James > > > > The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in > Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
Received on Thursday, 3 November 2011 12:42:12 UTC