W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > November 2011

Re: PROV-WG Reminder: Review PAQ before FPWD vote

From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:46:55 +0000
Message-ID: <4EC3787F.2080009@ninebynine.org>
To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
CC: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>, "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Noted.  I'll apply this next time I edit, unless you want to do it Paul.

#g
--


On 15/11/2011 17:12, Luc Moreau wrote:
> Looks fine to me.
>
> Luc
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Paul Groth [pgroth@gmail.com] on behalf of Paul Groth [p.t.groth@vu.nl]
> Sent: 15 November 2011 15:46
> To: Luc Moreau
> Cc: public-prov-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: PROV-WG Reminder: Review PAQ before FPWD vote
>
> We should. We can rename to
>
> PROV - Access and Query
>
> So prov-aq
>
> pg
>
>
> Luc Moreau wrote:
>> QA ... Quality Assurance ;-)
>>
>> Do we see PROV in the title?
>>
>> Luc
>>
>> On 11/15/2011 03:36 PM, Paul Groth wrote:
>>> Hi Luc,
>>>
>>> prov-qa sounds good to me. Any other suggestions?
>>> Paul
>>>
>>> Luc Moreau wrote:
>>>> Hi Paul and Graham,
>>>>
>>>> Do we want to use the PROV  branding for the document?
>>>> and prov-xxx for the short name?
>>>>
>>>> Luc
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 11/14/2011 08:11 PM, Paul Groth wrote:
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>> This is a reminder to have a look at the current PAQ to see if you
>>>>> support it going to FPWD.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/paq/provenance-access.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Paul
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>
> --
> Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl)
> http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth
> Assistant Professor
> Knowledge Representation&  Reasoning Group
> Artificial Intelligence Section
> Department of Computer Science
> VU University Amsterdam
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 16 November 2011 09:14:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:04 UTC