- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:46:55 +0000
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- CC: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>, "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Noted. I'll apply this next time I edit, unless you want to do it Paul. #g -- On 15/11/2011 17:12, Luc Moreau wrote: > Looks fine to me. > > Luc > > ________________________________________ > From: Paul Groth [pgroth@gmail.com] on behalf of Paul Groth [p.t.groth@vu.nl] > Sent: 15 November 2011 15:46 > To: Luc Moreau > Cc: public-prov-wg@w3.org > Subject: Re: PROV-WG Reminder: Review PAQ before FPWD vote > > We should. We can rename to > > PROV - Access and Query > > So prov-aq > > pg > > > Luc Moreau wrote: >> QA ... Quality Assurance ;-) >> >> Do we see PROV in the title? >> >> Luc >> >> On 11/15/2011 03:36 PM, Paul Groth wrote: >>> Hi Luc, >>> >>> prov-qa sounds good to me. Any other suggestions? >>> Paul >>> >>> Luc Moreau wrote: >>>> Hi Paul and Graham, >>>> >>>> Do we want to use the PROV branding for the document? >>>> and prov-xxx for the short name? >>>> >>>> Luc >>>> >>>> >>>> On 11/14/2011 08:11 PM, Paul Groth wrote: >>>>> Hi All, >>>>> >>>>> This is a reminder to have a look at the current PAQ to see if you >>>>> support it going to FPWD. >>>>> >>>>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/paq/provenance-access.html >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Paul >>>>> >>>>> >> > > -- > Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) > http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth > Assistant Professor > Knowledge Representation& Reasoning Group > Artificial Intelligence Section > Department of Computer Science > VU University Amsterdam > > >
Received on Wednesday, 16 November 2011 09:14:01 UTC