- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 16:44:43 -0500
- To: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Does anybody object to renaming wasQuoteOf to wasQuotedFrom?
I heard a +1 from Paul.
Thanks,
Tim
On Nov 16, 2011, at 11:58 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>
> PROV-ISSUE-151 (TLebo): Rename wasQuoteOf to wasQuotedFrom [Data Model]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/151
>
> Raised by: Timothy Lebo
> On product: Data Model
>
> After trying to model a few quotes, I continue to get hung up by "wasQuoteOf" and find "wasQuotedFrom" to be a more natural relation that clears some ambiguity about whether we are quoting some {web page, book, pamphlet} or the person that created the {web page, book, pamphlet}. According to the DM, I think it is the {web page, book, pamphlet} and depend on a qualifier to cite the person responsible.
>
> When encoding in PROV-O,
>
> :snippet prov:wasQuoteOf :web_page . (correct)
>
> :snippet prov:wasQuoteOf <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Mohandas_Karamchand_Gandhi> (INCORRECT - we should not cite the person.)
>
>
>
> using "wasQuotedFrom" would help avoid this confusion:
>
>
>
> :snippet prov:wasQuotedFrom :web_page . (correct)
>
> :snippet prov:wasQuotedFrom <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohandas_Karamchand_Gandhi> . (correct - this is a wiki page)
>
>
>
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-prov-dm-20111018/#quotation:
>
> wasQuoteOf(e2,e1,ag2,ag1):
>
> contains an identifier e2, identifying an entity expression that represents the quote;
> contains an identifier e1, identifying an entity expression representing what is being quoted;
> may refer to an agent who is doing the quoting, identified by ag2;
> may refer to the agent that is quoted, identified by ag1.
>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2011 21:45:10 UTC