- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 16:44:43 -0500
- To: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Does anybody object to renaming wasQuoteOf to wasQuotedFrom? I heard a +1 from Paul. Thanks, Tim On Nov 16, 2011, at 11:58 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > > PROV-ISSUE-151 (TLebo): Rename wasQuoteOf to wasQuotedFrom [Data Model] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/151 > > Raised by: Timothy Lebo > On product: Data Model > > After trying to model a few quotes, I continue to get hung up by "wasQuoteOf" and find "wasQuotedFrom" to be a more natural relation that clears some ambiguity about whether we are quoting some {web page, book, pamphlet} or the person that created the {web page, book, pamphlet}. According to the DM, I think it is the {web page, book, pamphlet} and depend on a qualifier to cite the person responsible. > > When encoding in PROV-O, > > :snippet prov:wasQuoteOf :web_page . (correct) > > :snippet prov:wasQuoteOf <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Mohandas_Karamchand_Gandhi> (INCORRECT - we should not cite the person.) > > > > using "wasQuotedFrom" would help avoid this confusion: > > > > :snippet prov:wasQuotedFrom :web_page . (correct) > > :snippet prov:wasQuotedFrom <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohandas_Karamchand_Gandhi> . (correct - this is a wiki page) > > > > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-prov-dm-20111018/#quotation: > > wasQuoteOf(e2,e1,ag2,ag1): > > contains an identifier e2, identifying an entity expression that represents the quote; > contains an identifier e1, identifying an entity expression representing what is being quoted; > may refer to an agent who is doing the quoting, identified by ag2; > may refer to the agent that is quoted, identified by ag1. > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2011 21:45:10 UTC