Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] from Timothy Lebo on 2011-11-06 (public-prov-wg@w3.org from November 2011)

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 16:24:41 -0500
To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Cc: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <29866760-7B13-4145-80D0-2B6CF0962FBE@rpi.edu>

By "appropriately scoped", I mean "predefined, consciously selected; URIs".

the note "refer to an identifier in the scope of a given account" sounds like we are going to permit lazy naming that can be computed in the future, which current named graph implementations do not support.

-Tim

On Nov 6, 2011, at 2:32 AM, Luc Moreau wrote:

> Hi Tim,
> 
> What do you mean by appropriately scoped?
> 
> Luc
> 
> 
> 
> I propose that we require the asserters to define appropriately-scoped URIs for their identifiers. Letting them be lazy up front will cause headaches when actually trying to use it.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Sunday, 6 November 2011 21:25:20 UTC