- From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 23:52:02 +0000
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-prov-wg@w3.org
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 10:49, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: > I guess we mean > "http://example.org/foo"^^rdf:Resource > as http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#Resource Is the intention here to use a non-datatype identifier as the datatype for RDF resources so that it clearly can't be directly translated to an RDF Literal of the same data type? I find it a bit odd to see ^^rdf:Resource on a literal - but that's because I've still got the RDF hat on. -- Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team School of Computer Science The University of Manchester
Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2011 23:52:52 UTC