- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 12:27:25 +0000
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Graham, This issue is now formally closed, since we have implemented it fully. Luc On 11/03/2011 11:24 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > PROV-ISSUE-140 (entity-qualifier-syntax): ASN uses different syntax for entity attributes and qualifiers > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/140 > > Raised by: Graham Klyne > On product: > > I note that the ASN uses expressions like: > > entity(e, [attr=val, attr=val, ...]) > > for Entities, but: > > wasDerivedFrom(e5,e3,pe4,qualifier(channel="out"),qualifier(channel="in")) > > in other contexts. Yet it seems to me that they serve very similar purposes. The different syntax feels a bit inconsistent to me. Suggest: > > entity(e, qualifier(attr=val, attr=val, ...)) > > This is not an important issue. If the editors choose to ignore it then I don't see it as something that should use up discussion time. > > > > > -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Wednesday, 30 November 2011 12:27:57 UTC