- From: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
- Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 17:14:03 +0100
- To: Jim McCusker <mccusj@rpi.edu>
- Cc: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAExK0DfZUHy3779TpuQM7HBv-B2nTcx5+81-5FwKpg599zPz5A@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Jim, what was rejected is Roles being subclasses of Entities. Roles can still be classes... In your example, I would make "presidentRole" and instance of class Role and then link it to the entity "Barack Obama". Best, Daniel 2011/11/6 Jim McCusker <mccusj@rpi.edu> > Make Roles resources like Entities. Classes of Roles (Creator, > Publisher, PrincipleInvestigator) are instantiated for each Entity. Of > course, this is rather similar to what's been rejected (?), but is > still the best choice, IMO. This would be, for instance, "Barack > Obama's role as president", as opposed to "the role of president", > which would be a class. > > Role could also be an extension of skos:Concept and allow you to > express "the role of president" directly without custom instantiation. > > Jim > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> > wrote: > > Ok, so, what's alternative suggestion ? > > > > Professor Luc Moreau > > Electronics and Computer Science > > University of Southampton > > Southampton SO17 1BJ > > United Kingdom > > > > > > On 6 Nov 2011, at 12:59, "Jim McCusker" <mccusj@rpi.edu> wrote: > > > >> This is a misunderstanding of a URI literal versus URI resource. When > >> a URI resource is used, it can link to that resource when it has > >> assertions made about it. This is not possible or intended with URI > >> literals. > >> > >> Jim > >> > >> On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 2:36 AM, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> > wrote: > >>> Hi Tim, > >>> > >>> But doesn't this include URIs by means of typed literals? > >>> > >>> Professor Luc Moreau > >>> Electronics and Computer Science > >>> University of Southampton > >>> Southampton SO17 1BJ > >>> United Kingdom > >>> > >>> On 6 Nov 2011, at 01:20, "Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker" < > sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] > >>>> > >>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/142 > >>>> > >>>> Raised by: Timothy Lebo > >>>> On product: Data Model > >>>> > >>>> prov-dm, 5.5.1 Qualifier: > >>>> > >>>> "The value associated with a role attribute must be conformant with > Literal." > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Will this prevent PROV-O from using URIs to cite roles? > >>>> > >>>> Restricting roles to literals will be severely limiting for PROV-O > and semantic web applications, since literals cannot be described or served > as linked data, and thus consumers will be unable to determine more > information about what the role means. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Jim McCusker > >> Programmer Analyst > >> Krauthammer Lab, Pathology Informatics > >> Yale School of Medicine > >> james.mccusker@yale.edu | (203) 785-6330 > >> http://krauthammerlab.med.yale.edu > >> > >> PhD Student > >> Tetherless World Constellation > >> Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute > >> mccusj@cs.rpi.edu > >> http://tw.rpi.edu > > > > > > > > -- > Jim McCusker > Programmer Analyst > Krauthammer Lab, Pathology Informatics > Yale School of Medicine > james.mccusker@yale.edu | (203) 785-6330 > http://krauthammerlab.med.yale.edu > > PhD Student > Tetherless World Constellation > Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute > mccusj@cs.rpi.edu > http://tw.rpi.edu > >
Received on Sunday, 6 November 2011 18:56:33 UTC