W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > November 2011

Re: Plan to progress PROV-AQ to FPWD

From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 12:27:03 +0000
Message-ID: <4ECF8997.9020308@ninebynine.org>
To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
CC: W3C provenance WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Paul,

I'd also like to add:

4a. Remove Appendix C "Motivating scenario".

I think it's too dated to be part of this FPWD, and it was really included for 
internal discussion rather than content that a user might be interested in.  I 
think it's served its purpose.  It could be re-introduced in updated form in a 
later draft if it's felt to be useful, but for now I think it does more harm 
than good.

#g
--

On 25/11/2011 09:42, Graham Klyne wrote:
> Paul,
>
> I've drawn up an outline plan for progressing PROV-AQ to FPWD. Do you think
> anything is missing here, or not required?
>
> ...
>
> Plan to progress PROV-AQ to FPWD
>
> 1. Change document tag and name from PAQ to PROV-AQ
> 2. Review issues and comments; apply simple non-controversial editorial suggestions
> 3. Close resolved issues
> 4. Review call-out boxes (issues and pending) and remove those that don't refer
> to live issues
> 5. Update author list
> 6. Update acknowledgements
> 7. Add status of this document text (Where can I find a template/example for
> this? W3C pubrules pages aren't helping me)
> 8. Prepare HTML document that meets W3C pubrules [1]
> 9. Submit for W3C FPWD publication
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/07/pubrules
>
> ...
>
> I note that we've received received quite a bit of useful feedback for
> clarification over the past week or so, and I think it would be useful to
> incorporate the simple editorial comments as they will hopefully help readers to
> understand better what we're trying to do. I should be able to do items 1-6
> within the next week.
>
> #g
> --
>
Received on Friday, 25 November 2011 12:37:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:04 UTC