Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) from Luc Moreau on 2011-11-09 (public-prov-wg@w3.org from November 2011)

From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 20:21:52 +0000
To: Simon Miles <simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk>
CC: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <EMEW3|8052859cd5430d985fba070469dde227nA8KMG08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|E4A02F0D>

Hi Simon 
I don't see why wasEventuallyDericedFrom can't be transitive?

It's also unclear how you decide between wasEventuallyDericed and dependendOn?

Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton 
Southampton SO17 1BJ
United Kingdom

On 9 Nov 2011, at 20:06, "Simon Miles" <simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk> wrote:

> If you think that we need a non-transitive relation wasEventuallyDerivedFrom, can you explain why?

Received on Wednesday, 9 November 2011 20:22:47 UTC