W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > November 2011

PAQ tidying notes

From: Simon Miles <simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:40:37 +0000
Message-ID: <CAKc1nHc4775=ytauGkKgPGGG1Zap-Ccb-m=+7=TpeC3_AVPtKw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Graham, Paul,

Suggestions on tidying up the PAQ document (not much):

Section 1. TODO is in the text, but it not so critical here as there's
no text to be intermingled with.

Section 1.2, paragraph 3: "Requests for provenance about a resource
may return provenance information that uses one or more entity-URIs to
refer to it." - not clear what "refer to it" means (given the
preceding paragraphs).

Section 3.3, end: There is one TODO in a box, two not in boxes, seems
untidy at least. The TODOs themselves could be expressed more clearly
(do we care that readers understand what we we are aware needs to be
done, or are the TODOs solely for us?)

Section 4.1.2. Not clear what @@redundant... text is for, and
shouldn't be intermingled in text.

Section 5.3 example: Graham's probably right that there's not much
better than is currently done, but I note that there is annotation
within the example in case a better way is thought of.

Section 8: Annotations are in the text and could be separated by
putting in boxes, to be consistent with rest of document.


Dr Simon Miles
Lecturer, Department of Informatics
Kings College London, WC2R 2LS, UK
+44 (0)20 7848 1166

Provenance-based Validation of E-Science Experiments:
Received on Thursday, 17 November 2011 16:41:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:04 UTC