- From: Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 08:39:53 +0000
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi, >> How do you propose doing this? > Would the one triple > > :e1 prov:wasComplementOf :e2 . > > work? This would stand independent of what account the entities are in -- which gets to the point I was making that the asserter needs to make distinct URIs and not depend on some account-based scoping mechanism to establish its identity. I thought this was based on the assumption that e1, e2 are not necessarily unique URIs across the space of defined accounts, hence the need to add scope information explicitly. if URIs are unique, then all is needed is a separate table that maps each URI to the account it belongs to -Paolo
Received on Monday, 7 November 2011 08:40:16 UTC