W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > November 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model]

From: Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 08:39:53 +0000
Message-ID: <4EB79959.6000707@ncl.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org

>> How do you propose doing this?
> Would the one triple
> :e1 prov:wasComplementOf :e2 .
> work? This would stand independent of what account the entities are in -- which gets to the point I was making that the asserter needs to make distinct URIs and not depend on some account-based scoping mechanism to establish its identity.
I thought this was based on the assumption that e1, e2 are not necessarily unique URIs across the space of defined accounts, hence 
the need to add scope information explicitly.

if URIs are unique, then all is needed is a separate table that maps each URI to the account it belongs to

Received on Monday, 7 November 2011 08:40:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:04 UTC