W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > November 2011

Re: Blog Post: 5 Simple Provenance Statements

From: Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 12:39:48 +0000
Message-ID: <4EB28B94.2080105@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
CC: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
In a previous email 
(http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2011Oct/0228.html) I 
indicated that I wanted to explore some simplified ways to express provenance 
information that could still be related to the provenance data model.

I've now taken a first stab at such an exploration, which I've posted in the 
working group wiki at 
http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Exploring_provenance_model_complexity

Part of what I wish to explore is ways in which the provenance model can be 
expressed in RDF, without necessarily having a 1:1 correspondence between the 
data model terms and the RDF terms used. To my mind, one of the main advantages 
of having a separate abstract syntax is that it allows exploration opf 
alternative representations while retaining the essential underlying structure.

#g
--
Received on Thursday, 3 November 2011 12:42:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:03 UTC