- From: Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 12:39:48 +0000
- To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- CC: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
In a previous email (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2011Oct/0228.html) I indicated that I wanted to explore some simplified ways to express provenance information that could still be related to the provenance data model. I've now taken a first stab at such an exploration, which I've posted in the working group wiki at http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Exploring_provenance_model_complexity Part of what I wish to explore is ways in which the provenance model can be expressed in RDF, without necessarily having a 1:1 correspondence between the data model terms and the RDF terms used. To my mind, one of the main advantages of having a separate abstract syntax is that it allows exploration opf alternative representations while retaining the essential underlying structure. #g --
Received on Thursday, 3 November 2011 12:42:08 UTC