- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:12:53 +0000
- To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- CC: "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Looks fine to me. Luc ________________________________________ From: Paul Groth [pgroth@gmail.com] on behalf of Paul Groth [p.t.groth@vu.nl] Sent: 15 November 2011 15:46 To: Luc Moreau Cc: public-prov-wg@w3.org Subject: Re: PROV-WG Reminder: Review PAQ before FPWD vote We should. We can rename to PROV - Access and Query So prov-aq pg Luc Moreau wrote: > QA ... Quality Assurance ;-) > > Do we see PROV in the title? > > Luc > > On 11/15/2011 03:36 PM, Paul Groth wrote: >> Hi Luc, >> >> prov-qa sounds good to me. Any other suggestions? >> Paul >> >> Luc Moreau wrote: >>> Hi Paul and Graham, >>> >>> Do we want to use the PROV branding for the document? >>> and prov-xxx for the short name? >>> >>> Luc >>> >>> >>> On 11/14/2011 08:11 PM, Paul Groth wrote: >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> This is a reminder to have a look at the current PAQ to see if you >>>> support it going to FPWD. >>>> >>>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/paq/provenance-access.html >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Paul >>>> >>>> > -- Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth Assistant Professor Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group Artificial Intelligence Section Department of Computer Science VU University Amsterdam
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2011 17:13:54 UTC