public-prov-wg@w3.org from November 2011 by author

Cresswell, Stephen

• Comments on PAQ (Friday, 18 November)

Daniel Garijo

• Re: PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 17 Nov 2011 (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: A proposal for modeling agents (Thursday, 10 November)
• Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Fwd: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: prov-dm qualifier: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: PROV-O telcon (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: Qualified Involvements proposal (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• Re: prov-dm attributes: two proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Wednesday, 2 November)

Eric Stephan

• Regrets (Wednesday, 2 November)

Graham Klyne

• Re: Plan to progress PROV-AQ to FPWD (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: PROV-DM derivation concerns arising from my primer review (Friday, 25 November)
• Re: Plan to progress PROV-AQ to FPWD (Friday, 25 November)
• Examoples in primer (was: Comments on the Primer) (Friday, 25 November)
• Re: Plan to progress PROV-AQ to FPWD (Friday, 25 November)
• Re: PROV-DM derivation concerns arising from my primer review (Friday, 25 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-175 (TLebo): 4.3 Provenance service discovery [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Friday, 25 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-168 (TLebo): HTTP POSTing a provenance URI to an originating source [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Friday, 25 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-165 (TLebo): Enforcing non-contradictory provenance. [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Thursday, 24 November)
• Re: Primer first draft for review (Thursday, 24 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-166 (TLebo): Sufficient _what_? (Thursday, 24 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-171 (TLebo): HTTP in RDF [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Friday, 25 November)
• Re: rel links in HTTP and HTML (Friday, 25 November)
• Plan to progress PROV-AQ to FPWD (Friday, 25 November)
• Re: rel links in HTTP and HTML (Thursday, 24 November)
• Re: PROV-DM derivation concerns arising from my primer review (Thursday, 24 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-162 (TLebo): Entities can only be web resources? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-164 (TLebo): pre-determined versus determined [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-163 (TLebo): What does provenance information describe? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (Tuesday, 22 November)
• SPARQL endpoint discovery - two suggestions (Saturday, 19 November)
• Re: PROV-DM derivation concerns arising from my primer review (Saturday, 19 November)
• Re: Comments on PAQ (Saturday, 19 November)
• SPARQL endpoint discovery (was: Comments on PAQ) (Saturday, 19 November)
• Re: Primer first draft for review (Friday, 18 November)
• Re: PAQ tidying notes (Thursday, 17 November)
• PROV-DM derivation concerns arising from my primer review (Thursday, 17 November)
• Re: Primer first draft for review (Thursday, 17 November)
• Re: PROV-WG Reminder: Review PAQ before FPWD vote (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: PROV-WG Reminder: Review PAQ before FPWD vote (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: PROV-WG Reminder: Review PAQ before FPWD vote (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Monday, 14 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (Monday, 14 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Monday, 14 November)
• Re: A proposal for modeling agents (Sunday, 13 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Sunday, 13 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (Sunday, 13 November)
• Semantics (Thursday, 10 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Thursday, 10 November)
• Re: prov-dm qualifier: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Thursday, 10 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Thursday, 10 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (Thursday, 10 November)
• Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Thursday, 10 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (Thursday, 10 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Thursday, 10 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-144 (Tlebo): how is "reserved attribute 'type'" related to rdf:type? [Data Model] (Thursday, 10 November)
• PAQ updates (Thursday, 10 November)
• Re: Blog Post: 5 Simple Provenance Statements (Thursday, 3 November)
• Re: prov-dm expression: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Thursday, 3 November)
• Re: Blog Post: 5 Simple Provenance Statements (Thursday, 3 November)
• PROV-DM - editorial nit (Thursday, 3 November)

James Cheney

• Re: prov-dm expression: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Wednesday, 2 November)
• Re: prov-dm expression: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Wednesday, 2 November)

Jim McCusker

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-166 (TLebo): Sufficient _what_? (Saturday, 26 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Thursday, 10 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-147 (Replace recipe): Change the name if "Recipe" [Data Model] (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-147 (Replace recipe): Change the name if "Recipe" [Data Model] (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)

Khalid Belhajjame

• Re: PROV-O comments (Thursday, 24 November)
• Comments on the Primer (Thursday, 24 November)
• Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Wednesday, 9 November)

Luc Moreau

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-149 (revision-asserter): Why does revision record include an asserter? [Data Model] (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-161 (TLebo): Quotation: quoting agent should be done with Accounts [Data Model] (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-160 (TLebo): Redundant terminology in new wasDerivedFrom classification scheme [Data Model] (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-158 (TLebo): Cite temporal ordering constraint [Data Model] (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-156 (TLebo): information flow ordering record - no temporal constraints? [Data Model] (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-149 (revision-asserter): Why does revision record include an asserter? [Data Model] (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-134: Non-Human Agent vs. Human Agent [Data Model] (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-130 (YolandaGil): Definition and examples of "agent" should be clarified in Provenance Data Model (PROV-DM) Draft [Data Model] (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-129 (YolandaGil): Definitions of "Activity"/"Event"/"ProcessExecution" should be more crisp and differentiable in Provenance Data Model (PROV-DM) Draft [Data Model] (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-127: Constraint id= participation (PROV DM and PROV ontology) [Data Model] (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-113: wasScheduledAfter is transitive [Conceptual Model] (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-100 (Entity definition): Section 5.2.1 Entity [Conceptual Model] (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: ISSUE-23: Create definition of involve to replace Use (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-146 (Tlebo): wasAttributeTo [Data Model] (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-143 (Tlebo): Qualifiers - why does order matter? [Data Model] (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-140 (entity-qualifier-syntax): ASN uses different syntax for entity attributes and qualifiers (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-126: Section 5.3.3.2 "Process Execution Independent Derivation Expression." [Data Model] (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-125: derivation-attributes constraint (PROV-DM and PROV-O) [Data Model] (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-122: Constraint on wasGeneratedBy (PROV-DM and PROV-OM) [Conceptual Model] (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-105: 5.3.1 Generation (current version of the conceptual model document) [Conceptual Model] (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-101 (Conceptual Model): Section 5.2.2 ProcessExecution (conceptual model document review) [Conceptual Model] (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-94 (pe-attributes): are process executions characterized in the same way as entities? [Conceptual Model] (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-91 (what-to-define-for-location): what should we define under the heading 'location' [Conceptual Model] (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-82 (pidm-event): Should we introduce a notion of event in the data model? [Conceptual Model] (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-81 (identity-clash-scope): In a given scope, are entities with same identifier but different attributes legal? [Conceptual Model] (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-71 (Conceptual Model draft): Section 3.2 of Conceptual Model draft (Content and Editing) [Conceptual Model] (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-69 (Process Execution): Process execution occurs over a "continuous time interval"? [Conceptual Model] (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-64 (definition-use): definition of use [Conceptual Model] (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-51 (asserter-def): Asserter needs to be defined with respect to a provenance container/account [Conceptual Model] (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-50 (Ordering of Process): Defintion for Ordering of Process [Conceptual Model] (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-49 (Participation): Suggested definition for Participation [Conceptual Model] (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-41 (distinct-roles): Distinct roles should be SHOULD and not MUST [Conceptual Model] (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-48 (Provenance Concept: Revision): Revision should be a class and not a property [Conceptual Model] (Wednesday, 30 November)
• PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 01 Dec 2011 (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-124: Constraints on Used Relation (PROV-DM and PROV-OM) [Conceptual Model] (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: PROV-O comments (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: Plan to progress PROV-AQ to FPWD (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: Plan to progress PROV-AQ to FPWD (Friday, 25 November)
• Re: Plan to progress PROV-AQ to FPWD (Friday, 25 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-161 (TLebo): Quotation: quoting agent should be done with Accounts [Data Model] (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: A proposal for modeling agents (Monday, 21 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-149 (revision-asserter): Why does revision record include an asserter? [Data Model] (Monday, 21 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-157 (TLebo): wasInformedBy's non-transitivity (Monday, 21 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-156 (TLebo): information flow ordering record - no temporal constraints? [Data Model] (Monday, 21 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-155 (prov-o-pre-fpwd): general comments on prov-o document [Formal Semantics] (Monday, 21 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-141 (agent-attributes): Is there a way to associate attributes (e.g. a name) with an agent in ASN? [Data Model] (Thursday, 17 November)
• Re: PROV-DM derivation concerns arising from my primer review (Thursday, 17 November)
• Re: PROV-DM derivation concerns arising from my primer review (Thursday, 17 November)
• Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Wednesday, 16 November)
• PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 17 Nov 2011 (Wednesday, 16 November)
• RE: PROV-WG Reminder: Review PAQ before FPWD vote (Tuesday, 15 November)
• Re: PROV-WG Reminder: Review PAQ before FPWD vote (Tuesday, 15 November)
• Re: PROV-WG Reminder: Review PAQ before FPWD vote (Tuesday, 15 November)
• Re: PROV-WG Reminder: Review PAQ before FPWD vote (Tuesday, 15 November)
• prov-o terms (Tuesday, 15 November)
• Re: PROV-WG Reminder: Review PAQ before FPWD vote (Tuesday, 15 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (Monday, 14 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] (Friday, 11 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-149 (revision-asserter): Why does revision record include an asserter? [Data Model] (Friday, 11 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-149 (revision-asserter): Why does revision record include an asserter? [Data Model] (Friday, 11 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] (Friday, 11 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Thursday, 10 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (Thursday, 10 November)
• Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Thursday, 10 November)
• Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Thursday, 10 November)
• Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Wednesday, 9 November)
• Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Wednesday, 9 November)
• Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Wednesday, 9 November)
• Re: prov-dm qualifier: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Wednesday, 9 November)
• Re: mercurial repository heads (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-101 (Conceptual Model): Section 5.2.2 ProcessExecution (conceptual model document review) [Conceptual Model] (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-126: Section 5.3.3.2 "Process Execution Independent Derivation Expression." [Data Model] (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: PROV-O telcon (Monday, 7 November)
• prov-dm qualifier: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-143 (Tlebo): Qualifiers - why does order matter? [Data Model] (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: Qualified Involvements proposal (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-147 (Replace recipe): Change the name if "Recipe" [Data Model] (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-147 (Replace recipe): Change the name if "Recipe" [Data Model] (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-147 (Replace recipe): Change the name if "Recipe" [Data Model] (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-147 (Replace recipe): Change the name if "Recipe" [Data Model] (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-147 (Replace recipe): Change the name if "Recipe" [Data Model] (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-147 (Replace recipe): Change the name if "Recipe" [Data Model] (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-125: derivation-attributes constraint (PROV-DM and PROV-O) [Data Model] (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-124: Constraints on Used Relation (PROV-DM and PROV-OM) [Conceptual Model] (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-100 (Entity definition): Section 5.2.1 Entity [Conceptual Model] (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-122: Constraint on wasGeneratedBy (PROV-DM and PROV-OM) [Conceptual Model] (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-105: 5.3.1 Generation (current version of the conceptual model document) [Conceptual Model] (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-101 (Conceptual Model): Section 5.2.2 ProcessExecution (conceptual model document review) [Conceptual Model] (Monday, 7 November)
• prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: PROV-O telcon (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• F2F2 dates and locations poll: deadline Nov 16th (Sunday, 6 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• Meeting minutes 2011-11-03 (Friday, 4 November)
• Re: Blog Post: 5 Simple Provenance Statements (Thursday, 3 November)
• Re: prov-dm expression: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Wednesday, 2 November)
• Re: prov-dm expression: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Wednesday, 2 November)
• PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 3 Nov 2011 (Tuesday, 1 November)

Myers, Jim

• RE: PROV-DM derivation concerns arising from my primer review (Monday, 28 November)
• RE: A proposal for modeling agents (Thursday, 10 November)
• RE: prov-dm qualifier: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Wednesday, 9 November)
• RE: prov-dm expression: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Wednesday, 2 November)
• RE: prov-dm expression: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Wednesday, 2 November)

Paolo Missier

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-124: Constraints on Used Relation (PROV-DM and PROV-OM) [Conceptual Model] (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: Examoples in primer (Friday, 25 November)
• Re: Comments on the Primer (Thursday, 24 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-143 (Tlebo): Qualifiers - why does order matter? [Data Model] (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-160 (TLebo): Redundant terminology in new wasDerivedFrom classification scheme [Data Model] (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-135 (collection-names): Collection relations have confusing names [Data Model] (Tuesday, 15 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Thursday, 10 November)
• Re: prov-dm qualifier: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Wednesday, 9 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: PROV-O telcon (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-147 (Replace recipe): Change the name if "Recipe" [Data Model] (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-144 (Tlebo): how is "reserved attribute 'type'" related to rdf:type? [Data Model] (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-143 (Tlebo): Qualifiers - why does order matter? [Data Model] (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-146 (Tlebo): wasAttributeTo [Data Model] (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: prov-o example relations (Thursday, 3 November)
• Re: prov-dm expression: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Wednesday, 2 November)

Paul Groth

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-91 (what-to-define-for-location): what should we define under the heading 'location' [Conceptual Model] (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-51 (asserter-def): Asserter needs to be defined with respect to a provenance container/account [Conceptual Model] (Wednesday, 30 November)
• PROV-WG: Telecon Agenda Nov 23, 2012 (Wednesday, 23 November)
• CFP: 4th International Provenance and Annotation Workshop (IPAW'2012) (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: Quotation example (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: PROV-WG Reminder: Review PAQ before FPWD vote (Tuesday, 15 November)
• Re: PROV-WG Reminder: Review PAQ before FPWD vote (Tuesday, 15 November)
• Re: PROV-WG Reminder: Review PAQ before FPWD vote (Tuesday, 15 November)
• PROV-WG: Minutes from Nov 10, 2011 Telecon (Monday, 14 November)
• PROV-WG Reminder: Review PAQ before FPWD vote (Monday, 14 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] (Friday, 11 November)
• PROV-WG scribe needed (Thursday, 10 November)
• Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Wednesday, 9 November)
• Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Wednesday, 9 November)
• PROV-WG: Telecon Agenda Nov. 10 2011 (Wednesday, 9 November)
• Re: Reminder: Please fill out F2F Poll (Wednesday, 9 November)
• Reminder: Please fill out F2F Poll (Wednesday, 9 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-43 (derivation-time): Deriviation should have associated time [Conceptual Model] (Wednesday, 9 November)
• Re: Qualified Involvements proposal (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• PROV-WG: Minutes October 27, 2011 (Tuesday, 1 November)

Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker

• PROV-ISSUE-175 (TLebo): 4.3 Provenance service discovery [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Wednesday, 23 November)
• PROV-ISSUE-174 (TLebo): Replace http://example.info with http://example.{com,org} [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Wednesday, 23 November)
• PROV-ISSUE-173 (TLebo): representations versus formats [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Wednesday, 23 November)
• PROV-ISSUE-172 (TLebo): purpose of prov:hasAnchor [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Wednesday, 23 November)
• PROV-ISSUE-171 (TLebo): HTTP in RDF [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Wednesday, 23 November)
• PROV-ISSUE-170 (TLebo): Resources are "represented", not "presented" [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Wednesday, 23 November)
• PROV-ISSUE-169 (TLebo): Motivating provenance services in PAQ [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Wednesday, 23 November)
• PROV-ISSUE-168 (TLebo): HTTP POSTing a provenance URI to an originating source [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Wednesday, 23 November)
• PROV-ISSUE-167 (TLebo): What is a "normal web resource"? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Wednesday, 23 November)
• PROV-ISSUE-166 (TLebo): Sufficient _what_? (Wednesday, 23 November)
• PROV-ISSUE-165 (TLebo): Enforcing non-contradictory provenance. [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Wednesday, 23 November)
• PROV-ISSUE-164 (TLebo): pre-determined versus determined [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Wednesday, 23 November)
• PROV-ISSUE-163 (TLebo): What does provenance information describe? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Wednesday, 23 November)
• PROV-ISSUE-162 (TLebo): Entities can only be web resources? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Wednesday, 23 November)
• PROV-ISSUE-161 (TLebo): Quotation: quoting agent should be done with Accounts [Data Model] (Tuesday, 22 November)
• PROV-ISSUE-160 (TLebo): Redundant terminology in new wasDerivedFrom classification scheme [Data Model] (Monday, 21 November)
• PROV-ISSUE-159 (Tlebo): note on how PROV-O inteprets DM's "type" and "subtype" [Ontology] (Monday, 21 November)
• PROV-ISSUE-158 (TLebo): Cite temporal ordering constraint [Data Model] (Monday, 21 November)
• PROV-ISSUE-157 (TLebo): wasInformedBy's non-transitivity (Monday, 21 November)
• PROV-ISSUE-156 (TLebo): information flow ordering record - no temporal constraints? [Data Model] (Monday, 21 November)
• PROV-ISSUE-155 (prov-o-pre-fpwd): general comments on prov-o document [Formal Semantics] (Monday, 21 November)
• PROV-ISSUE-154 (RDF-provenance-service-uri): Include provenance-service-uri for RDF resources [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Saturday, 19 November)
• PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (Friday, 18 November)
• PROV-ISSUE-152 (QualifiedInvolvement): will the QualifiedInvolvement approach work for other relations? [Ontology] (Friday, 18 November)
• PROV-ISSUE-151 (TLebo): Rename wasQuoteOf to wasQuotedFrom [Data Model] (Wednesday, 16 November)
• PROV-ISSUE-150: question on formal semantics of role in wasGeneratedBy relation [Formal Semantics] (Monday, 14 November)
• PROV-ISSUE-149 (revision-asserter): Why does revision record include an asserter? [Data Model] (Friday, 11 November)
• PROV-ISSUE-148 (WasScheduledAfter): wasScheduledAfter definition is difficult to understand (Thursday, 10 November)
• PROV-ISSUE-147 (Replace recipe): Change the name if "Recipe" [Data Model] (Monday, 7 November)
• PROV-ISSUE-146 (Tlebo): wasAttributeTo [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• PROV-ISSUE-144 (Tlebo): how is "reserved attribute 'type'" related to rdf:type? [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• PROV-ISSUE-143 (Tlebo): Qualifiers - why does order matter? [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• PROV-ISSUE-141 (agent-attributes): Is there a way to associate attributes (e.g. a name) with an agent in ASN? [Data Model] (Thursday, 3 November)
• PROV-ISSUE-140 (entity-qualifier-syntax): ASN uses different syntax for entity attributes and qualifiers (Thursday, 3 November)

Reza B'Far (Oracle)

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-134: Non-Human Agent vs. Human Agent [Data Model] (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: prov-dm qualifier: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Wednesday, 9 November)
• Re: prov-dm expression: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Wednesday, 2 November)

Ryan Golden

• Re: prov-dm qualifier: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Wednesday, 9 November)
• Re: prov-dm expression: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Wednesday, 2 November)

Satya Sahoo

• Re: PROV-O comments (Tuesday, 29 November)
• PROV-O telcon (Nov 28) (Monday, 28 November)
• CFP: Eighth International Conference on Data Integration in the Life Sciences (DILS 2012) (Thursday, 24 November)
• Ontology telcon (Monday, 21 November)
• Review of PROV-O for FPWD vote (Tuesday, 15 November)
• Updates on issues raised for PROV-O (Tuesday, 15 November)
• Re: prov-o terms (Tuesday, 15 November)
• PROV-O telcon (Monday, 14 November)
• Re: prov-dm qualifier: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Wednesday, 9 November)
• Re: mercurial repository heads (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: PROV-O telcon (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-147 (Replace recipe): Change the name if "Recipe" [Data Model] (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-147 (Replace recipe): Change the name if "Recipe" [Data Model] (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-147 (Replace recipe): Change the name if "Recipe" [Data Model] (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-147 (Replace recipe): Change the name if "Recipe" [Data Model] (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: PROV-O telcon (Monday, 7 November)
• PROV-O telcon (Sunday, 6 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• Re: prov-o example relations (Wednesday, 2 November)
• Re: prov-dm expression: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Wednesday, 2 November)
• Re: prov-dm expression: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Wednesday, 2 November)

Simon Miles

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-149 (revision-asserter): Why does revision record include an asserter? [Data Model] (Wednesday, 30 November)
• Re: PROV-O comments (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: PROV-DM derivation concerns arising from my primer review (Friday, 25 November)
• PROV-O comments (Thursday, 24 November)
• Re: PROV-DM derivation concerns arising from my primer review (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: Primer first draft for review (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: Primer first draft for review (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (Monday, 21 November)
• PAQ tidying notes (Thursday, 17 November)
• Re: Primer first draft for review (Thursday, 17 November)
• Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Primer first draft for review (Tuesday, 15 November)
• Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Sunday, 13 November)
• Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Sunday, 13 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-149 (revision-asserter): Why does revision record include an asserter? [Data Model] (Sunday, 13 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-149 (revision-asserter): Why does revision record include an asserter? [Data Model] (Friday, 11 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-149 (revision-asserter): Why does revision record include an asserter? [Data Model] (Friday, 11 November)
• Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Thursday, 10 November)
• Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Thursday, 10 November)
• Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Thursday, 10 November)
• Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Wednesday, 9 November)
• Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Wednesday, 9 November)
• Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Wednesday, 9 November)
• Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Wednesday, 9 November)
• Re: prov-dm qualifier: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Wednesday, 9 November)
• Re: Primer new plan (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Primer new plan (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: Thoughts in the prov primer (Monday, 7 November)

Stephan Zednik

• Re: PROV-ISSUE-164 (TLebo): pre-determined versus determined [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (Thursday, 24 November)
• Re: A proposal for modeling agents (Monday, 21 November)
• Re: A proposal for modeling agents (Monday, 14 November)
• Re: A proposal for modeling agents (Sunday, 13 November)
• Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Wednesday, 9 November)
• Re: prov-dm qualifier: a proposal to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Wednesday, 9 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-147 (Replace recipe): Change the name if "Recipe" [Data Model] (Monday, 7 November)
• RE: PROV-O telcon (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• RE: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• Thoughts in the prov primer (Thursday, 3 November)

Stian Soiland-Reyes

• Re: PROV-O comments (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: PROV-O comments (Tuesday, 29 November)
• Re: PROV-DM derivation concerns arising from my primer review (Monday, 28 November)
• Re: PROV-DM derivation concerns arising from my primer review (Thursday, 24 November)
• Re: rel links in HTTP and HTML (Thursday, 24 November)
• Re: Quotation example (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-153 (complementarity): Complementarity description differs from model definition [Primer] (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: PROV-O telcon (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Monday, 14 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (Monday, 14 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Sunday, 13 November)
• Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Sunday, 13 November)
• Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Sunday, 13 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-143 (Tlebo): Qualifiers - why does order matter? [Data Model] (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-147 (Replace recipe): Change the name if "Recipe" [Data Model] (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-147 (Replace recipe): Change the name if "Recipe" [Data Model] (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: PROV-O telcon (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: prov-dm attributes: two proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Wednesday, 2 November)

Tim Lebo

• Re: PROV-O telcon (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)

Timothy Lebo

• rel links in HTTP and HTML (Wednesday, 23 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-151 (TLebo): Rename wasQuoteOf to wasQuotedFrom [Data Model] (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-124: Constraints on Used Relation (PROV-DM and PROV-OM) [Conceptual Model] (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: Quotation example (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: prov-dm derivation: three proposals to vote on (deadline Wednesday midnight GMT) (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: prov-o terms (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-150: question on formal semantics of role in wasGeneratedBy relation [Formal Semantics] (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: PROV-O telcon (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: PROV-O telcon (Tuesday, 22 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-149 (revision-asserter): Why does revision record include an asserter? [Data Model] (Monday, 21 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-149 (revision-asserter): Why does revision record include an asserter? [Data Model] (Monday, 21 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-160 (TLebo): Redundant terminology in new wasDerivedFrom classification scheme [Data Model] (Monday, 21 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-148 (WasScheduledAfter): wasScheduledAfter definition is difficult to understand (Monday, 21 November)
• Re: Leveraging OBE for PROV-O Accounts (Monday, 21 November)
• Re: Ontology telcon (Monday, 21 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-126: Section 5.3.3.2 "Process Execution Independent Derivation Expression." [Data Model] (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-143 (Tlebo): Qualifiers - why does order matter? [Data Model] (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-143 (Tlebo): Qualifiers - why does order matter? [Data Model] (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-147 (Replace recipe): Change the name if "Recipe" [Data Model] (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: Qualified Involvements proposal (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: Qualified Involvements proposal (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-125: derivation-attributes constraint (PROV-DM and PROV-O) [Data Model] (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-124: Constraints on Used Relation (PROV-DM and PROV-OM) [Conceptual Model] (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-105: 5.3.1 Generation (current version of the conceptual model document) [Conceptual Model] (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Quotation example (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Leveraging OBE for PROV-O Accounts (Thursday, 10 November)
• New URL for PROV-O ontology (Wednesday, 9 November)
• Re: mercurial repository heads (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: mercurial repository heads (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: mercurial repository heads (Tuesday, 8 November)
• mercurial repository heads (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-101 (Conceptual Model): Section 5.2.2 ProcessExecution (conceptual model document review) [Conceptual Model] (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: feedback on Qualified Involvements wiki page (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-144 (Tlebo): how is "reserved attribute 'type'" related to rdf:type? [Data Model] (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: PROV-O telcon (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: PROV-O telcon (Sunday, 6 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (Sunday, 6 November)
• Qualified Involvements proposal (Sunday, 6 November)

Yolanda Gil

• A proposal for modeling agents (Thursday, 10 November)

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 November 2011 20:07:03 UTC