W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > November 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-82 (pidm-event): Should we introduce a notion of event in the data model? [Conceptual Model]

From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 11:54:05 +0000
Message-ID: <EMEW3|9737290244bdc45427635802ddd83424nAYBs908L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4ED6195D.1070007@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
For the record, we are now formally closing this issue.
Luc

On 09/23/2011 12:16 PM, Luc Moreau wrote:
>
> We are closing this issue pending review.
>
> We went for the following:
> - introduce events as part of the conceptualization
> - introduce the concept of partial order between order
> but
> - not make events an explicit type of the data model, though use the 
> term 'event' in explanations
> - not make relation 'precede' between events an explicit construct of 
> the model
>
> Luc
>
>
> On 25/08/2011 10:16, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>> PROV-ISSUE-82 (pidm-event): Should we introduce a notion of event in 
>> the data model? [Conceptual Model]
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/82
>>
>> Raised by: Luc Moreau
>> On product: Conceptual Model
>>
>>
>> The notion of event is defined implicitly, but not listed as one of 
>> the concepts. Would it facilitate the presentation of the model to 
>> define this concept explicitly.
>>
>> See James' comment:   
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2011Aug/0349.html
>>
>> See Satya's comment: 
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2011Aug/0342.html
>>
>>
>>
>

-- 
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Wednesday, 30 November 2011 11:54:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:04 UTC