- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:18:00 -0500
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-prov-wg@w3.org
On Nov 7, 2011, at 5:29 PM, Luc Moreau wrote: > Hi Tim and Paolo, > > What about "A qualifier is a set of name-value pairs ..." Eliminating order with a set would be great. > > I propose to close this issue, unless you state otherwise. I'm okay with closing it, if order is replaced by set. I tried to see if it did change at http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/ProvenanceModel.html but couldn't find the matching section from the FPWD. Did the change happen? Thanks, Tim > > Thanks, > Luc > > On 07/11/11 08:26, Paolo Missier wrote: >> I don't think they should have an order >> >> -Paolo >> >> On 11/6/11 1:27 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >>> PROV-ISSUE-143 (Tlebo): Qualifiers - why does order matter? [Data Model] >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/143 >>> >>> Raised by: Timothy Lebo >>> On product: Data Model >>> >>> Qualifiers are defined as having order. Why do they need to be ordered? >>> >>> >>> 5.5.1 Qualifier >>> >>> "A qualifier is an ordered list of name-value pairs, used to qualify use expressions, generation expressions and control expressions." >>> >>> >>> 6. PROV-DM Extensibility Points >>> >>> "Qualifiers offer a mechanism to describe modalities of use, generation, and control They consist of ordered sequence of name-value pairs." >>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 16 November 2011 17:18:42 UTC