W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > November 2011

Re: Qualified Involvements proposal

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:26:19 -0500
Message-Id: <9BB6CAB8-F4F9-4A99-B46B-D436F1F1C7CF@rpi.edu>
To: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>

On Nov 7, 2011, at 4:23 PM, Luc Moreau wrote:

> Hi Tim,
> 
> Does it mean we can introduce identifiers to Usage/Generation/etc ... ?

Absolutely.


> It would help simplify some aspects of the data model.

Great!

> 
> Also, could you confirm the names of all the new classes you have defined.

Usage, Participation, Control, and Generation are subclasses of QualifiedInvolvement .


> For instance, should we change 'Use Record' into 'Usage Record' in prov-dm?

I think this would help.

-Tim


> 
> Thanks,
> Luc
> 
> 
> 
> On 06/11/11 21:20, Timothy Lebo wrote:
>> prov-wg,
>> 
>> The following link reflects the OWL group's discussions from the past week about replacing EntityInRole with qualified involvements.
>> 
>> Please have a read.
>> 
>> If you'd like to join our Monday noon US ET (we switched our clocks today) skype discussions, please let me and Satya know.
>> 
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/Qualifed_Involvements_in_PROV-O
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Tim Lebo
>>   
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 16 November 2011 16:26:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:04 UTC