W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > November 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-144 (Tlebo): how is "reserved attribute 'type'" related to rdf:type? [Data Model]

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 10:31:10 -0500
Cc: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <620B6538-E3D9-48B7-A0A8-09CB17444E19@rpi.edu>
To: Paolo Missier <Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk>
Thanks, Paolo. I closed the issue.

-Tim

On Nov 7, 2011, at 3:28 AM, Paolo Missier wrote:

> Tim
> 
> that is indeed the expected mapping to RDFS, however I am not sure such language-specific mapping should be mentioned/ recommended in PROV-DM?
> 
> Thanks, -Paolo
> 
> On 11/6/11 1:32 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>> PROV-ISSUE-144 (Tlebo): how is "reserved attribute 'type'" related to rdf:type? [Data Model]
>> 
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/144
>> 
>> Raised by: Timothy Lebo
>> On product: Data Model
>> 
>> The reserved attribute "type" is used a few places, but with no mention to its relation to rdf:type. This becomes particularly concerning when "subtyping" is mentioned. Should we avoid reinventing the wheel? Can we say somewhere that "type" SHOULD BE considered as rdf:type, and RDFS should be used to handle subtyping semantics and inference?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 6. PROV-DM Extensibility Points
>> 
>> "Subtyping is allowed by means of the reserved attribute type."
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2011 15:31:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:04 UTC