- From: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:10:21 +0100
- To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- CC: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hey Tim, This is cool. You had some questions: > Would the prov-wg accept using rdf:value for the string that is quoted? I think we don't say. It's not clear how you identify the quoted string. You could quote something else. > Would "wasQuotedFrom" be more intuitive than "wasQuoteOf"? Seems a reasonable change to me > Isn't this just a special kind of derivation? Shouldn't be handled with the core constructs with appropriate roles, etc? It is a special case. In PROV-DM, it defines the pattern that the construct represents. cheers, Paul Timothy Lebo wrote: > prov-wg, > > During my attempt to rescue examples from the email thread into > concrete PROV-O encodings, I found that I wanted to quote something > Luc said. > > So why not try out PROV-O? > > I added a new example attempting to model Quotation. > > Some notes about it are at: > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/PROV_OWL_ontology_component_examples#Quoting_some_text_in_an_email_archived_on_the_web > > Comments welcome. > > Regards, Tim Lebo > > p.s. - I'm in the process of catching up from the last week, > apologies for the lag and the out-of-date responses that are coming > your way! -- Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ Assistant Professor Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group Artificial Intelligence Section Department of Computer Science VU University Amsterdam
Received on Wednesday, 16 November 2011 15:10:56 UTC