W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > November 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-48 (Provenance Concept: Revision): Revision should be a class and not a property [Conceptual Model]

From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 08:32:52 +0000
Message-ID: <EMEW3|3f555fec1cbc18b68e12bfe371e71ee3nAY8Wy08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4ED5EA34.4040107@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Satya,

I trust you were satisfied with the message of 08/22, we are now formally
closing this issued.

Regards,
Luc

On 08/22/2011 10:06 PM, Luc Moreau wrote:
>
>
> Hi Satya,
> This issue was closed, pending review.
> Are you satisfied with the changes? Can we
> close it? Alternatively, you can reopen it,
> or create a more specific issue.
> Thanks,
> Luc
>
> PS See note on this issue's page
>
>
> On 27/07/11 01:37, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>> PROV-ISSUE-48 (Provenance Concept: Revision): Revision should be a 
>> class and not a property [Conceptual Model]
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/48
>>
>> Raised by: Satya Sahoo
>> On product: Conceptual Model
>>
>> Revision is a new BOB and not a property as defined currently in 
>> conceptual model:
>>
>> isRevisionOf(b2,b1,ag)
>>
>> The above description is already covered by isDerivedFrom property.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

-- 
Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk
United Kingdom                     http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Wednesday, 30 November 2011 08:33:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:04 UTC