Re: PROV-O comments

• From: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>
• Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 15:16:52 +0000
• To: Simon Miles <simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk>
• CC: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <4ECE5FE4.3070804@cs.man.ac.uk>

Hi Simon,

On 24/11/2011 15:12, Simon Miles wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Just a few comments on PROV-O (as downloaded yesterday), nothing
> blocking release as FPWD. Apologies if these have already been raised
> in others' comments.
>
> Are figures going to be updated to use Activity rather
> ProcessExecution before release? Or text reverted to use
> ProcessExecution? If neither, it would be helpful for readers if
> there's a clear note to say they are equivalent, perhaps at the start
> of Section 3.1 where ProcessExecution first appears (in the figure).
The figures were updated last night, and Activity is now used instead of 
Process Execution in the diagrams.

Thanks, khalid

Received on Thursday, 24 November 2011 15:17:29 UTC