W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > November 2011

Re: PROV-O comments

From: Satya Sahoo <satya.sahoo@case.edu>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 11:06:34 -0500
Message-ID: <CAOMwk6zXuzzJLrBAefXWk3G+HAfJArg5EmMhWnpGGnFO1HP6LA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Cc: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>, Simon Miles <simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk>, Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Luc,
Thanks for catching that! Stian has updated the diagram.

Best,
Satya

On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:14 AM, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>wrote:

> Btw, I saw there was still an EntityInRole in the ontology picture.
> Luc
>
> Professor Luc Moreau
> Electronics and Computer Science
> University of Southampton
> Southampton SO17 1BJ
> United Kingdom
>
> On 24 Nov 2011, at 15:17, "Khalid Belhajjame" <
> Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> > Hi Simon,
> >
> > On 24/11/2011 15:12, Simon Miles wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Just a few comments on PROV-O (as downloaded yesterday), nothing
> >> blocking release as FPWD. Apologies if these have already been raised
> >> in others' comments.
> >>
> >> Are figures going to be updated to use Activity rather
> >> ProcessExecution before release? Or text reverted to use
> >> ProcessExecution? If neither, it would be helpful for readers if
> >> there's a clear note to say they are equivalent, perhaps at the start
> >> of Section 3.1 where ProcessExecution first appears (in the figure).
> > The figures were updated last night, and Activity is now used instead of
> Process Execution in the diagrams.
> >
> > Thanks, khalid
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 29 November 2011 16:07:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:04 UTC