W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > November 2011

Re: PROV-O comments

From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 06:14:43 +0000
To: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>
CC: Simon Miles <simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk>, Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <EMEW3|f9a4e14766de23207fbd0ab74ecb27a5nAS6F708L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|0447160A-05AF-4A93-B349-0A27077B3834@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Btw, I saw there was still an EntityInRole in the ontology picture.
Luc

Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science
University of Southampton 
Southampton SO17 1BJ
United Kingdom

On 24 Nov 2011, at 15:17, "Khalid Belhajjame" <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk> wrote:

> Hi Simon,
> 
> On 24/11/2011 15:12, Simon Miles wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> Just a few comments on PROV-O (as downloaded yesterday), nothing
>> blocking release as FPWD. Apologies if these have already been raised
>> in others' comments.
>> 
>> Are figures going to be updated to use Activity rather
>> ProcessExecution before release? Or text reverted to use
>> ProcessExecution? If neither, it would be helpful for readers if
>> there's a clear note to say they are equivalent, perhaps at the start
>> of Section 3.1 where ProcessExecution first appears (in the figure).
> The figures were updated last night, and Activity is now used instead of Process Execution in the diagrams.
> 
> Thanks, khalid
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 29 November 2011 06:15:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:04 UTC