- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 16:28:01 -0500
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On Nov 6, 2011, at 2:36 AM, Luc Moreau wrote: > Hi Tim, > > But doesn't this include URIs by means of typed literals? If it does, then I'm okay with letting PROV-DM think in terms of literals. But I don't want this statement to exclude the benefits of URIs when citing roles. (now, on to read the other 50 responses in this thread). -Tim > > Professor Luc Moreau > Electronics and Computer Science > University of Southampton > Southampton SO17 1BJ > United Kingdom > > On 6 Nov 2011, at 01:20, "Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker" <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: > >> >> PROV-ISSUE-142 (Tlebo): Can roles only be Literals? [Data Model] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/142 >> >> Raised by: Timothy Lebo >> On product: Data Model >> >> prov-dm, 5.5.1 Qualifier: >> >> "The value associated with a role attribute must be conformant with Literal." >> >> >> >> Will this prevent PROV-O from using URIs to cite roles? >> >> Restricting roles to literals will be severely limiting for PROV-O and semantic web applications, since literals cannot be described or served as linked data, and thus consumers will be unable to determine more information about what the role means. >> >> >> > >
Received on Sunday, 6 November 2011 21:30:57 UTC