- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 12:31:02 +0000
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
Hi Tim, This issue is now formally closed, since we have adopted attribute-value sets. Regards, Luc On 11/22/2011 02:23 PM, Paolo Missier wrote: > works for me! > > -Paolo > > On 11/7/11 10:29 PM, Luc Moreau wrote: >> Hi Tim and Paolo, >> >> What about "A qualifier is a set of name-value pairs ..." >> >> I propose to close this issue, unless you state otherwise. >> >> Thanks, >> Luc >> >> On 07/11/11 08:26, Paolo Missier wrote: >>> I don't think they should have an order >>> >>> -Paolo >>> >>> On 11/6/11 1:27 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >>>> PROV-ISSUE-143 (Tlebo): Qualifiers - why does order matter? [Data >>>> Model] >>>> >>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/143 >>>> >>>> Raised by: Timothy Lebo >>>> On product: Data Model >>>> >>>> Qualifiers are defined as having order. Why do they need to be >>>> ordered? >>>> >>>> >>>> 5.5.1 Qualifier >>>> >>>> "A qualifier is an ordered list of name-value pairs, used to qualify >>>> use expressions, generation expressions and control expressions." >>>> >>>> >>>> 6. PROV-DM Extensibility Points >>>> >>>> "Qualifiers offer a mechanism to describe modalities of use, >>>> generation, and control They consist of ordered sequence of >>>> name-value pairs." >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> > > -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Wednesday, 30 November 2011 12:31:41 UTC