W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-prov-wg@w3.org > November 2011

Re: PROV-ISSUE-162 (TLebo): Entities can only be web resources? [Accessing and Querying Provenance]

From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 20:54:45 +0000
Message-ID: <4ECD5D95.6040607@ninebynine.org>
To: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
CC: Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Hmmm... I meant "Web resource" in the sense of anything that can be identified 
by a URI.  So the intent is the same as DM's definition.

Maybe that should be revised thus:

"An entity is simply a resource (in the sense defined by Web Architecture - 
http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#id-resources) that is a contextualized view or 
instance of an original resource"

#g
--


On 23/11/2011 15:10, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>
> PROV-ISSUE-162 (TLebo): Entities can only be web resources? [Accessing and Querying Provenance]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/162
>
> Raised by: Timothy Lebo
> On product: Accessing and Querying Provenance
>
> PAQ states that an Entity is only a web resource, while DM defines it to be more general.
>
> PAQ:
>
> "An entity is simply a web resource that is a contextualized view or instance of an original web resource"
>
> DM:
>
> "We then define an entity as an identifiable characterized thing. An entity fixes some aspects of a thing and its situation in the world, so that it becomes possible to express its provenance, and what causes these specific aspects to be as such"
>
> ---
> Is the PAQ restricting itself to access and query of only web resource Entities? If so, this distinction and restricted applicability should be explicitly stated. As it reads now, it gives the impression that the restricted web resource view of Entity is what an Entity _is_ in DM.
>
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 24 November 2011 09:30:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:51:04 UTC