W3C home
>
Mailing lists
>
Public
>
w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
>
October to December 2005
w3c-dist-auth@w3.org from October to December 2005 by date
1610 messages
:
Starting
Saturday, 1 October 2005 11:32:21 GMT,
Ending
Saturday, 31 December 2005 21:14:17 GMT
sort by
: [
thread
] [
author
] [ date ] [
subject
]
Mail actions
: [
mail a new topic
]
Help
: [
How to use the archives
] [
Search in the archives
]
Saturday, 31 December 2005
Re: draft-ietf-webdav-quota-07.txt: DAV:quota-not-exceeded
Lisa Dusseault
[Bug 213] Spec inconsistent on PROPFIND/Depth:infinity
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 212] Spec inconsistent on PROPFIND/Depth:infinity
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 212] New: Spec inconsistent on PROPFIND/Depth:infinity
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 213] New: Spec inconsistent on PROPFIND/Depth:infinity
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 202] Move description of lock-null resources into appendix
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 211] New: Inconsistencies about Destination header
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 80] Specify idempotence and safeness for all new methods
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 181] error element
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 80] Specify idempotence and safeness for all new methods
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Re: [Bug 124] REPORT_OTHER_RESOURCE_LOCKED
Julian Reschke
[Bug 124] REPORT_OTHER_RESOURCE_LOCKED
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 147] CLARIFY_UNTAGGED_IF_HEADER_APPLICATION
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 121] OVERWRITE_DELETE_ERROR_STATUS
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Re: draft-ietf-webdav-quota-07.txt: DAV:quota-not-exceeded
Julian Reschke
[Bug 10] Round-tripping various information in properties
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 10] Round-tripping various information in properties
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Re: Question on GULP - properties defined as lockable, and content of a resource
Julian Reschke
Re-using 414 status codes (related to Bug 31)
Julian Reschke
Re: New Security considerations
Julian Reschke
[Bug 181] error element
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Re: [Bug 179] DAV:no-lock
Geoffrey M Clemm
[Bug 179] DAV:no-lock
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 184] Clarifications requested for section 19.8 on hosting malicious content
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 176] Etag requirements (unchanged body for resource)
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 177] "PROPFIND status codes" section
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 176] Etag requirements (unchanged body for resource)
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 177] "PROPFIND status codes" section
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 179] DAV:no-lock
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 181] error element
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Friday, 30 December 2005
[Bug 184] Clarifications requested for section 19.8 on hosting malicious content
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
New Security considerations (was: Re: [Bug 184] )
Lisa Dusseault
[Bug 184] Section 19.8 added with no open issue nor WG consensus
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 208] spec contradictory in ETag requirements
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 184] Section 19.8 added with no open issue nor WG consensus
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 207] Compliance class descriptions for "1" and "2"
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 208] spec contradictory in ETag requirements
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 209] invalid etag in example
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 210] incorrect statement on PROPPATCH and property recurrence
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 206] broken RFC2616 references for some DAV:get* properties
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Re: Question on GULP - resources added to locked collection
Geoffrey M Clemm
Re: Question on GULP - properties defined as lockable, and content of a resource
Geoffrey M Clemm
Thursday, 29 December 2005
Re: Question on GULP - resources added to locked collection
Lisa Dusseault
Question on GULP - properties defined as lockable, and content of a resource
Lisa Dusseault
Re: Question on GULP - resources added to locked collection
Geoffrey M Clemm
Question on GULP - resources added to locked collection
Lisa Dusseault
Wednesday, 28 December 2005
Re: Comments in XML-valued dead properties
Geoffrey M Clemm
[Bug 206] broken RFC2616 references for some DAV:get* properties
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 171] If header grammar
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 118] WHEN_TO_MULTISTATUS_FOR_DELETE_2
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 107] Status 102 present; but status-uri response header removed
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 104] Confusing new sentence in intro of COPY
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 106] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs merge behaviour desc added
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 106] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs merge behaviour desc added
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 106] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs merge behaviour desc added
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 106] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs merge behaviour desc added
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 94] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 50] Property teminology inconsistent with RFC3253
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 53] DAV:responsedescription content model
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 50] Property teminology inconsistent with RFC3253
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 50] Property teminology inconsistent with RFC3253
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Comments in XML-valued dead properties
Lisa Dusseault
[Bug 28] MOVE vs live properties
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 86] DAV header definitions should use RFC3864 templates
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 10] Round-tripping various information in properties
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 118] WHEN_TO_MULTISTATUS_FOR_DELETE_2
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 104] Confusing new sentence in intro of COPY
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Feedback on Bug 18
Julian Reschke
[Bug 171] If header grammar
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 13] new ETag requirements
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 208] spec contradictory in ETag requirements
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 206] broken RFC2616 references for some DAV:get* properties
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 181] error element
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Tuesday, 27 December 2005
[Bug 142] URL_ENCODING_ISSUES
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 141] UNLOCK_WITHOUT_GOOD_TOKEN
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 138] UNLOCK_WHAT_URL
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 53] DAV:responsedescription content model
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 13] new ETag requirements
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 10] Round-tripping various information in properties
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 80] Specify idempotence and safeness for all new methods
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 80] Specify idempotence and safeness for all new methods
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 131] DISPLAYNAME
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 131] DISPLAYNAME
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Re: [Bug 96] combining tagged list and untagged list
Julian Reschke
[Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 193] LOCK_ISSUES_WRITE_LOCK
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 96] combining tagged list and untagged list
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Re: [Bug 131] DISPLAYNAME
Lisa Dusseault
[Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 171] If header grammar
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 96] combining tagged list and untagged list
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 144] IF_HEADER_CHECKS_AFTER_OTHER_CHECKS
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 131] DISPLAYNAME
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 143] LOCK_RENEWAL_SHOULD_NOT_USE_IF_HEADER
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 131] DISPLAYNAME
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 113] IMPLIED_LWS
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 96] combining tagged list and untagged list
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 62] href format
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 52] "mandatory" properties
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Saturday, 24 December 2005
Re: Status of Bugzilla Bug 10, Round-tripping various information in properties
Julian Reschke
Friday, 23 December 2005
Re: Status of Bugzilla Bug 10, Round-tripping various information in properties
Elias Sinderson
Re: Status of Bugzilla Bug 10, Round-tripping various information in properties
Wilfredo Sánchez Vega
Re: Status of Bugzilla Bug 10, Round-tripping various information in properties
Wilfredo Sánchez Vega
Re: Status of Bugzilla Bug 10, Round-tripping various information in properties
Geoffrey M Clemm
Re: Status of Bugzilla Bug 10, Round-tripping various information in properties
Lisa Dusseault
Re: Status of Bugzilla Bug 10, Round-tripping various information in properties
Geoffrey M Clemm
Re: Status of Bugzilla Bug 10, Round-tripping various information in properties
Lisa Dusseault
Re: Status of Bugzilla Bug 10, Round-tripping various information in properties
Geoffrey M Clemm
Re: Status of Bugzilla Bug 10, Round-tripping various information in properties
Julian Reschke
Re: Forms-Based Authentication in DAV - Explore
Joachim Feise
Forms-Based Authentication in DAV - Explore
vinod appajanna
Re: Status of Bugzilla Bug 10, Round-tripping various information in properties
Wilfredo Sánchez Vega
RE: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Dan Brotsky
RE: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Dan Brotsky
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Wilfredo Sánchez Vega
Thursday, 22 December 2005
[Bug 181] error element
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Re: Status of Bugzilla Bug 10, Round-tripping various information in properties
Julian Reschke
Re: Status of Bugzilla Bug 10, Round-tripping various information in properties
Geoffrey M Clemm
Re: Status of Bugzilla Bug 10, Round-tripping various information in properties
Jim Whitehead
Re: Status of Bugzilla Bug 10, Round-tripping various information in properties
Geoffrey M Clemm
Status of Bugzilla Bug 10, Round-tripping various information in properties
Julian Reschke
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Julian Reschke
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Geoffrey M Clemm
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Geoffrey M Clemm
Re: Bindings and permissions
Julian Reschke
RE: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Dan Brotsky
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Yves Lafon
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Julian Reschke
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Julian Reschke
Schedule for finishing
Cullen Jennings
Wednesday, 21 December 2005
[Bug 202] Move description of lock-null resources into appendix
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 193] LOCK_ISSUES_WRITE_LOCK
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 193] LOCK_ISSUES_WRITE_LOCK
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 193] LOCK_ISSUES_WRITE_LOCK
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 194] LOCK_ISSUES_WRITE_LOCKS_AND_COLLECTIONS
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 195] LOCK_ISSUES_WRITE_LOCKS_AND_COPYMOVE
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 195] LOCK_ISSUES_WRITE_LOCKS_AND_COPYMOVE
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
RE: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Geoffrey M Clemm
[Bug 195] LOCK_ISSUES_WRITE_LOCKS_AND_COPYMOVE
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 196] LOCK_ISSUES_ERROR_CODES
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 196] LOCK_ISSUES_ERROR_CODES
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 196] LOCK_ISSUES_ERROR_CODES
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 197] LOCK_ISSUES_IF_HEADER
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
RE: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Geoffrey M Clemm
[Bug 197] LOCK_ISSUES_IF_HEADER
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 197] LOCK_ISSUES_IF_HEADER
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 202] Move description of lock-null resources into appendix
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 198] LOCK_ISSUES_SHARED_LOCKS
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 202] Move description of lock-null resources into appendix
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 202] Move description of lock-null resources into appendix
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Lisa Dusseault
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Lisa Dusseault
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Geoffrey M Clemm
RE: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Geoffrey M Clemm
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Geoffrey M Clemm
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Julian Reschke
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Geoffrey M Clemm
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Julian Reschke
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Julian Reschke
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Julian Reschke
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Julian Reschke
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Geoffrey M Clemm
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Stefan Eissing
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Yves Lafon
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Yves Lafon
RE: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Yves Lafon
RE: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Dan Brotsky
RE: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Dan Brotsky
RE: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Dan Brotsky
RE: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Dan Brotsky
RE: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Dan Brotsky
RE: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Dan Brotsky
RE: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Dan Brotsky
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Wilfredo Sánchez Vega
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Julian Reschke
Tuesday, 20 December 2005
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Wilfredo Sánchez Vega
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Wilfredo Sánchez Vega
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Lisa Dusseault
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Wilfredo Sánchez Vega
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Geoffrey M Clemm
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Geoffrey M Clemm
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Geoffrey M Clemm
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Geoffrey M Clemm
Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
Julian Reschke
Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
Lisa Dusseault
Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
Julian Reschke
Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
Lisa Dusseault
Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
Julian Reschke
[Bug 86] DAV header definitions should use RFC3864 templates
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
Lisa Dusseault
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Lisa Dusseault
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Yves Lafon
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Yves Lafon
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Jim Luther
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Stefan Eissing
Document Action: 'Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV) Redirect Reference Resources' to Experimental RFC
The IESG
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Geoffrey M Clemm
RE: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Geoffrey M Clemm
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Geoffrey M Clemm
Re: BIND, was: [Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed
Geoffrey M Clemm
Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
Geoffrey M Clemm
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Stefan Eissing
Re: BIND, was: [Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed
Stefan Eissing
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Julian Reschke
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Julian Reschke
Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
Julian Reschke
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Julian Reschke
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Julian Reschke
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Julian Reschke
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Julian Reschke
Re: BIND, was: [Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed
Cullen Jennings
Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
Cullen Jennings
RE: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Dan Brotsky
RE: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Dan Brotsky
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Geoffrey M Clemm
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Wilfredo Sánchez Vega
RE: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Dan Brotsky
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Jim Whitehead
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Jim Whitehead
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Wilfredo Sánchez Vega
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Wilfredo Sánchez Vega
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Cullen Jennings
Monday, 19 December 2005
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Julian Reschke
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Julian Reschke
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Ted Hardie
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Yves Lafon
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Ted Hardie
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Julian Reschke
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Julian Reschke
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Julian Reschke
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Jim Whitehead
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Cullen Jennings
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Cullen Jennings
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Julian Reschke
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Jim Whitehead
Re: Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Lisa Dusseault
Summary of ETag related issues in RFC2518bis
Julian Reschke
Re: BIND, was: [Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed
Jim Whitehead
Sunday, 18 December 2005
[Bug 187] Changes section organization
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 185] Missing interpunction in "previous authors" subsection
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 182] whitespace in lock token in example
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 180] Typo in 13.18, enhance reference
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 168] Revert to original reference style
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 88] typo in list
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 68] Reference to XML spec
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 63] typo in 13.16 "name" line
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 57] incorrect section reference
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 30] incorrect XML in example
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Re: [Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed
Julian Reschke
[Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 181] error element
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 181] error element
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 50] Property teminology inconsistent with RFC3253
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 210] New: incorrect statement on PROPPATCH and property recurrence
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 50] Property teminology inconsistent with RFC3253
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Saturday, 17 December 2005
[Bug 13] new ETag requirements
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 209] New: invalid etag in example
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 208] New: spec contradictory in ETag requirements
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 147] CLARIFY_UNTAGGED_IF_HEADER_APPLICATION
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 147] CLARIFY_UNTAGGED_IF_HEADER_APPLICATION
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 147] CLARIFY_UNTAGGED_IF_HEADER_APPLICATION
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Re: BIND, was: [Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed
Geoffrey M Clemm
[Bug 121] OVERWRITE_DELETE_ERROR_STATUS
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 121] OVERWRITE_DELETE_ERROR_STATUS
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
BIND, was: [Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed
Julian Reschke
[Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
Geoffrey M Clemm
Re: Bindings and permissions
Geoffrey M Clemm
Bindings and permissions
Lisa Dusseault
Friday, 16 December 2005
Re: Question for implementors: definition of Lock with bindings
Julian Reschke
Question for implementors: definition of Lock with bindings
Lisa Dusseault
[Bug 154] ADD_DEPTH_ZERO_DELETE
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
Julian Reschke
[Bug 154] ADD_DEPTH_ZERO_DELETE
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 154] ADD_DEPTH_ZERO_DELETE
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 156] HOW_ARE_TRAILING_SLASHES_USED
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 112] MKCOL_AND_302
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 134] PROPFIND_INFINITY
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 114] PUT_AND_INTERMEDIATE_COLLECTIONS
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 123] MULTISTATUS_FROM_MKCOL
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 121] OVERWRITE_DELETE_ERROR_STATUS
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 118] WHEN_TO_MULTISTATUS_FOR_DELETE_2
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 121] OVERWRITE_DELETE_ERROR_STATUS
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 118] WHEN_TO_MULTISTATUS_FOR_DELETE_2
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 117] WHEN_TO_MULTISTATUS_FOR_DELETE_1
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 115] INTEROP_DELETE_AND_MULTISTATUS
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 115] INTEROP_DELETE_AND_MULTISTATUS
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 115] INTEROP_DELETE_AND_MULTISTATUS
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 44] OPTIONS *
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 48] XML extensibility description
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 47] 3xx in multistatus
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Thursday, 15 December 2005
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis-09.txt
Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
[Bug 105] COPY for Collection Resources vs infinite loops
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
Julian Reschke
[Bug 207] New: Compliance class descriptions for "1" and "2"
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 73] "Changes" section missing
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Re: Do server store arbitrary content
Julian Reschke
Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
Julian Reschke
Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
Julian Reschke
Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
Cullen Jennings
Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
Geoffrey M Clemm
Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
Elias Sinderson
Re: Concern about bugzilla SPAM
Cullen Jennings
Re: [Bug 171] If header grammar
Cullen Jennings
Re: Do server store arbitrary content
Cullen Jennings
Was ... Re: [Bug 161] EVALUATE_ALL_OF_IF_HEADER
Cullen Jennings
Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
Cullen Jennings
Re: Do server store arbitrary content
Cullen Jennings
Wednesday, 14 December 2005
Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
Geoffrey M Clemm
Re: Do server store arbitrary content
Julian Reschke
Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
Julian Reschke
Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
Lisa Dusseault
Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
Geoffrey M Clemm
Re: Do server store arbitrary content
Lisa Dusseault
Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
Lisa Dusseault
Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
Julian Reschke
Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
Lisa Dusseault
Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
Julian Reschke
Tuesday, 13 December 2005
Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
Lisa Dusseault
Wednesday, 14 December 2005
[Bug 188] PROPFIND include-dead-props
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 166] XML_GUIDELINES_CONFORMANCE
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 79] PUT for collections rationale
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 127] PUT_ON_COLLECTION
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 132] DEPTH_LOCK_AND_IF
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 131] DISPLAYNAME
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 125] COPY_INTO_YOURSELF_CLARIFY
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 113] IMPLIED_LWS
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 157] REMOVE_ETAG_SUPPORT_FOR_IF_HEADER
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 104] Confusing new sentence in intro of COPY
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 139] MUST_AN_IF_HEADER_CHECK_THE_ROOT_OF_URL
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 147] CLARIFY_UNTAGGED_IF_HEADER_APPLICATION
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 144] IF_HEADER_CHECKS_AFTER_OTHER_CHECKS
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 144] IF_HEADER_CHECKS_AFTER_OTHER_CHECKS
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 159] ORDER_OF_HEADER_EVALUATION
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 147] CLARIFY_UNTAGGED_IF_HEADER_APPLICATION
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 143] LOCK_RENEWAL_SHOULD_NOT_USE_IF_HEADER
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 163] REMOVE_NOT_SUPPORT_FROM_IF_HEADERS
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 162] REMOVE_UNTAGGED_IF_HEADER
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 161] EVALUATE_ALL_OF_IF_HEADER
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 144] IF_HEADER_CHECKS_AFTER_OTHER_CHECKS
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 144] IF_HEADER_CHECKS_AFTER_OTHER_CHECKS
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 160] IF_HEADERS_CAN_GET_LONG
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 171] If header grammar
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Re: Review of RFC2518bis pre-draft
Jim Whitehead
Re: New compliance class - was Re: [Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class
Geoffrey M Clemm
Re: New compliance class - was Re: [Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class
Jim Whitehead
Re: Concern about bugzilla SPAM
Stefan Eissing
Re: Concern about bugzilla SPAM
Elias Sinderson
Re: Tomorrows call
Elias Sinderson
Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
Cullen Jennings
Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
Geoffrey M Clemm
Re: New compliance class - was Re: [Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class
Geoffrey M Clemm
Re: Concern about bugzilla SPAM
Julian Reschke
Re: New compliance class - was Re: [Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class
Julian Reschke
Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
Julian Reschke
Re: Do server store arbitrary content
Julian Reschke
Re: Tomorrows call
Julian Reschke
Re: Concern about bugzilla SPAM
Cullen Jennings
Re: Do server store arbitrary content
Cullen Jennings
Tomorrows call
Cullen Jennings
Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ...
Cullen Jennings
Re: Concern about bugzilla SPAM
Jim Luther
Re: [Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks
Cullen Jennings
Tuesday, 13 December 2005
Re: [Bug 188] PROPFIND include-dead-props
Cullen Jennings
Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
Cullen Jennings
Concern about bugzilla SPAM
Cullen Jennings
Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ...
Wilfredo Sánchez Vega
New compliance class - was Re: [Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class
Cullen Jennings
Re: Do server store arbitrary content
Geoffrey M Clemm
Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ...
Geoffrey M Clemm
Re: Do server store arbitrary content
Julian Reschke
Re: Do server store arbitrary content
Geoffrey M Clemm
Re: unsubscribe s.y.crompton@dl.ac.uk
Jim Luther
Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ...
Julian Reschke
[Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ...
Cullen Jennings
Do server store arbitrary content
Cullen Jennings
Re: unsubscribe s.y.crompton@dl.ac.uk
Crompton, SY \(Shirley\)
[Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 181] error element
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
Julian Reschke
Monday, 12 December 2005
[Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 48] XML extensibility description
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 48] XML extensibility description
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 48] XML extensibility description
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 48] XML extensibility description
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 53] DAV:responsedescription content model
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 48] XML extensibility description
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Fwd: RFC 4316 on Datatypes for Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV) Properties]
Julian Reschke
Re: Review of RFC2518bis pre-draft
Julian Reschke
[Bug 112] MKCOL_AND_302
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 112] MKCOL_AND_302
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 95] possible LOCK response codes
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 106] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs merge behaviour desc added
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 205] new MUST level requirement for LOCK on unmapped URLs
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 53] DAV:responsedescription content model
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 42] Consider deprecating text/xml for XML request/response bodies
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 48] XML extensibility description
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 96] combining tagged list and untagged list
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 95] possible LOCK response codes
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 106] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs merge behaviour desc added
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 145] LOCKDISCOVERY_ON_UNLOCKED_RESOURCE
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 53] DAV:responsedescription content model
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 47] 3xx in multistatus
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 113] IMPLIED_LWS
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 143] LOCK_RENEWAL_SHOULD_NOT_USE_IF_HEADER
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 62] href format
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 205] new MUST level requirement for LOCK on unmapped URLs
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 152] SHOULD_A_SERVER_DETERMINE_MIMETYPE_OF_CONTENT
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 152] SHOULD_A_SERVER_DETERMINE_MIMETYPE_OF_CONTENT
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 53] DAV:responsedescription content model
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 42] Consider deprecating text/xml for XML request/response bodies
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 112] MKCOL_AND_302
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Re: Review of RFC2518bis pre-draft
Jim Whitehead
[Bug 112] MKCOL_AND_302
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 112] MKCOL_AND_302
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Sunday, 11 December 2005
[Bug 206] New: broken RFC2616 references for some DAV:get* properties
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Re: [Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed
Julian Reschke
Saturday, 10 December 2005
[Bug 72] Review references section
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 48] XML extensibility description
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 112] MKCOL_AND_302
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 112] MKCOL_AND_302
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 96] combining tagged list and untagged list
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 110] COMPLIANCE_RESOURCE
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 96] combining tagged list and untagged list
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 48] XML extensibility description
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 169] Date header required?
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 119] DATE_FORMAT_GETLASTMODIFIED
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 95] possible LOCK response codes
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 106] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs merge behaviour desc added
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 145] LOCKDISCOVERY_ON_UNLOCKED_RESOURCE
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 47] 3xx in multistatus
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 47] 3xx in multistatus
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 113] IMPLIED_LWS
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 113] IMPLIED_LWS
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 143] LOCK_RENEWAL_SHOULD_NOT_USE_IF_HEADER
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 62] href format
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Re: Review of RFC2518bis pre-draft
Julian Reschke
[Bug 205] New: new MUST level requirement for LOCK on unmapped URLs
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 53] DAV:responsedescription content model
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 42] Consider deprecating text/xml for XML request/response bodies
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 145] LOCKDISCOVERY_ON_UNLOCKED_RESOURCE
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 148] SECTION_12_4_MENTIONS_HREF_ELEMENT
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 166] XML_GUIDELINES_CONFORMANCE
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 181] error element
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 170] no mention of 424 in section 8.3.2
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 112] MKCOL_AND_302
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 165] DAV_ERROR_SUPPORT
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 15] DAV:error description inconsistent with RFC3253
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 135] RESOURCETYPE_EXTENSION
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 15] DAV:error description inconsistent with RFC3253
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 164] HOW_DOES_WEBDAV_SUPPORT_VARIANTS
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 137] OPTIONS_RESPONSE_VARIES_FOR_RESOURCES
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 143] LOCK_RENEWAL_SHOULD_NOT_USE_IF_HEADER
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 153] CAN_HREF_BE_RELATIVE
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 46] URLs in Multistatus
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 126] EXTEND_UNDEFINED
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 110] COMPLIANCE_RESOURCE
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 44] OPTIONS *
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 110] COMPLIANCE_RESOURCE
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 96] combining tagged list and untagged list
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 104] Confusing new sentence in intro of COPY
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 101] Extensibility for dav:owner
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 131] DISPLAYNAME
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 150] SOURCE_PROPERTY_UNDERSPECIFIED
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 106] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs merge behaviour desc added
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 60] If header evaluation when?
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 140] UNLOCK_NEEDS_IF_HEADER
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 169] Date header required?
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 149] NEW_MULTIPUT_METHOD
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 129] LOCK_BODY_SHOULD_BE_MUST
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 116] OVERWRITE_DELETE_ALL_TOO_STRONG
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 113] IMPLIED_LWS
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 111] DEFINE_PRINCIPAL
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 119] DATE_FORMAT_GETLASTMODIFIED
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 192] LOCK_ISSUES_LOCK_URI_TYPE
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 10] Round-tripping various information in properties
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 146] PROP_ROUNDTRIP
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 10] Round-tripping various information in properties
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 191] LOCK_ISSUES_ACCESS_RIGHTS
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 190] HTTP examples using RFC2629 markup
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 102] lock tokens in examples
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 87] broken XML source of spec
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 183] Outdated references
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 186] opaquelocktoken appendix
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 186] opaquelocktoken appendix
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 189] "RFC2518bis" in spec text
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 199] Front matter editorial nits
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 203] DAV:lockdiscovery in multistatus (8.11.8)
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 201] LWS allowed in Coded-URL
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 204] DAV:creationdate vs client sychronization
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 62] href format
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 60] If header evaluation when?
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 58] MOVE status 403 description
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 53] DAV:responsedescription content model
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 53] DAV:responsedescription content model
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Friday, 9 December 2005
[Bug 52] "mandatory" properties
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 53] DAV:responsedescription content model
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 50] Property teminology inconsistent with RFC3253
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 51] Property behaviour upon COPY vs "remote COPY"
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 48] XML extensibility description
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 44] OPTIONS *
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 47] 3xx in multistatus
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 46] URLs in Multistatus
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 42] Consider deprecating text/xml for XML request/response bodies
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 32] DAV:displayname handling
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Re: Review of RFC2518bis pre-draft
Elias Sinderson
Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT vs strong ETags]
Wilfredo Sánchez Vega
Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT vs strong ETags]
Julian Reschke
Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT vs strong ETags]
Wilfredo Sánchez Vega
[Bug 28] MOVE vs live properties
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 26] URL syntax in PROPFIND
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 156] HOW_ARE_TRAILING_SLASHES_USED
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 16] Trailing slash required in collection names?
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Review of RFC2518bis pre-draft
Julian Reschke
[Bug 15] DAV:error description inconsistent with RFC3253
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 204] New: DAV:creationdate vs client sychronization
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 15] DAV:error description inconsistent with RFC3253
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 107] Status 102 present; but status-uri response header removed
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 106] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs merge behaviour desc added
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 47] 3xx in multistatus
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 46] URLs in Multistatus
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 6] Collection Lock vs MOVE with Overwrite
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 93] Write Locks and Collections vs MOVE
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 6] Collection Lock vs MOVE with Overwrite
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 203] New: DAV:lockdiscovery in multistatus (8.11.8)
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Re: [Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties
Julian Reschke
Re: [Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties
Jim Whitehead
[Bug 202] Move description of lock-null resources into appendix
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 202] New: Move description of lock-null resources into appendix
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Re: [Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties
Geoffrey M Clemm
[Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Implementations of draft-ietf-webdav-redirectref-protocol
Julian Reschke
Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT vs strong ETags]
Julian Reschke
[Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Re: [Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties
Julian Reschke
Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT vs strong ETags]
Wilfredo Sánchez Vega
Thursday, 8 December 2005
Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT vs strong ETags]
Julian Reschke
Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT vs strong ETags]
Wilfredo Sánchez Vega
Re: [Bug 120] DEEP_LOCK_ERROR_STATUS
DigitallySmooth
Re: OT but nice productivity hack: Yubnub to find RFCs, I-Ds and WGs
DigitallySmooth
Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
Geoffrey M Clemm
RE: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
Lukas Mathis
GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
Julian Reschke
Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT vs strong ETags]
Julian Reschke
Re: Client comments?
Julian Reschke
Re: [Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties
Julian Reschke
[Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
draft-ietf-webdav-quota-07.txt: DAV:quota-not-exceeded
Bernard Desruisseaux
Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT vs strong ETags]
Wilfredo Sánchez Vega
Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT vs strong ETags]
Jim Whitehead
Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT vs strong ETags]
Wilfredo Sánchez Vega
Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT vs strong ETags]
Lisa Dusseault
Re: [Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties
Lisa Dusseault
Wednesday, 7 December 2005
OT but nice productivity hack: Yubnub to find RFCs, I-Ds and WGs
Lisa Dusseault
[Bug 120] DEEP_LOCK_ERROR_STATUS
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 140] UNLOCK_NEEDS_IF_HEADER
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 140] UNLOCK_NEEDS_IF_HEADER
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 143] LOCK_RENEWAL_SHOULD_NOT_USE_IF_HEADER
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 136] LOCKS_SHOULD_THEY_USE_AN_IF_HEADER_TO_VERIFY
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 132] DEPTH_LOCK_AND_IF
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 132] DEPTH_LOCK_AND_IF
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 124] REPORT_OTHER_RESOURCE_LOCKED
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 124] REPORT_OTHER_RESOURCE_LOCKED
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 120] DEEP_LOCK_ERROR_STATUS
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 120] DEEP_LOCK_ERROR_STATUS
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 58] MOVE status 403 description
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Client comments? (was: [Bug 10] Round-tripping [...])
Elias Sinderson
[Bug 107] Status 102 present; but status-uri response header removed
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 107] Status 102 present; but status-uri response header removed
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 106] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs merge behaviour desc added
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 106] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs merge behaviour desc added
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 105] COPY for Collection Resources vs infinite loops
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 188] PROPFIND include-dead-props
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 188] PROPFIND include-dead-props
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 46] URLs in Multistatus
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 15] DAV:error description inconsistent with RFC3253
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 15] DAV:error description inconsistent with RFC3253
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Re: GULP (Lock Semantics), was: Agenda for 12/6 telecon
Elias Sinderson
GULP (Lock Semantics), was: Agenda for 12/6 telecon
Julian Reschke
Tuesday, 6 December 2005
[Bug 95] possible LOCK response codes
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Agenda for 12/6 telecon
Elias Sinderson
[Bug 188] PROPFIND include-dead-props
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 188] PROPFIND include-dead-props
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Re: [Bug 201] LWS allowed in Coded-URL
Julian Reschke
[Bug 186] opaquelocktoken appendix
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 176] Etag requirements (unchanged body for resource)
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 186] opaquelocktoken appendix
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 143] LOCK_RENEWAL_SHOULD_NOT_USE_IF_HEADER
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 136] LOCKS_SHOULD_THEY_USE_AN_IF_HEADER_TO_VERIFY
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 140] UNLOCK_NEEDS_IF_HEADER
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 136] LOCKS_SHOULD_THEY_USE_AN_IF_HEADER_TO_VERIFY
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Re: [Bug 201] LWS allowed in Coded-URL
Jim Whitehead
Monday, 5 December 2005
[Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Re: Proposal for response URLs in Multi-Status: always based on Request-URI
Geoffrey M Clemm
Re: [Bug 188] PROPFIND include-dead-props
Julian Reschke
Re: [Bug 201] LWS allowed in Coded-URL
Julian Reschke
Re: Proposal for response URLs in Multi-Status: always based on Request-URI
Julian Reschke
Sunday, 4 December 2005
Re: Proposal for response URLs in Multi-Status: always based on Request-URI
Geoffrey M Clemm
[Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Re: [Bug 188] PROPFIND include-dead-props
Lisa Dusseault
[Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 46] URLs in Multistatus
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Proposal for response URLs in Multi-Status: always based on Request-URI
Lisa Dusseault
[Bug 47] 3xx in multistatus
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Re: [Bug 201] LWS allowed in Coded-URL
Lisa Dusseault
[Bug 46] URLs in Multistatus
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 47] 3xx in multistatus
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 47] 3xx in multistatus
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 201] LWS allowed in Coded-URL
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Re: [Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks
Lisa Dusseault
Saturday, 3 December 2005
Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT vs strong ETags]
Wilfredo Sánchez Vega
Friday, 2 December 2005
Re: [Bug 201] LWS allowed in Coded-URL
Julian Reschke
Re: [Bug 188] PROPFIND include-dead-props
Julian Reschke
Saturday, 3 December 2005
Re: [Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks
Julian Reschke
[Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Friday, 2 December 2005
[Bug 22] attributes on properties
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 174] Terminology in 4.4: "namespace name in scope"
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 201] LWS allowed in Coded-URL
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Re: [Bug 188] PROPFIND include-dead-props
Lisa Dusseault
[Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Re: [Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks
Lisa Dusseault
[Bug 104] Confusing new sentence in intro of COPY
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 99] Risks Connected with Lock Tokens
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 80] Specify idempotence and safeness for all new methods
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 79] PUT for collections rationale
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 59] failed LOCK response body
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 56] 423 Locked in Multistatus for PROPPATCH?
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 55] Multistatus format (empty)
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 52] "mandatory" properties
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 189] "RFC2518bis" in spec text
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 189] "RFC2518bis" in spec text
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 189] "RFC2518bis" in spec text
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 175] Sectiion 8.1.3 unneeded
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 175] Sectiion 8.1.3 unneeded
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 178] Multistatus for DELETE
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 128] LEVEL_OR_CLASS
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 103] Start of introduction for DELETE confusing
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 91] chapter name for lock token uri schemes
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 128] LEVEL_OR_CLASS
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 103] Start of introduction for DELETE confusing
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 174] Terminology in 4.4: "namespace name in scope"
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 90] broken RFC2277 reference
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 174] Terminology in 4.4: "namespace name in scope"
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 22] attributes on properties
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 94] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 16] Trailing slash required in collection names?
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 156] HOW_ARE_TRAILING_SLASHES_USED
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 149] NEW_MULTIPUT_METHOD
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
agenda for 12/2 telecon
Elias Sinderson
[Bug 16] Trailing slash required in collection names?
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 16] Trailing slash required in collection names?
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 72] Review references section
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 35] RFC2606 compliance
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 44] OPTIONS *
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 28] MOVE vs live properties
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 51] Property behaviour upon COPY vs "remote COPY"
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 95] possible LOCK response codes
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Thursday, 1 December 2005
Re: [Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks
Julian Reschke
Re: [Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks
Lisa Dusseault
Re: [Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks
Julian Reschke
Re: [Bug 171] If header grammar
Julian Reschke
Wednesday, 30 November 2005
[Bug 41] Paragraph numbering/nesting broken in Section 13
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 40] Definition of "null resource" gone
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 28] MOVE vs live properties
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 25] lock to unmapped URL
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 23] lock discovery vs shared locks
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-reschke-webdav-mount-03.txt]
Julian Reschke
[Bug 8] Section 9.1: extend production
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 8] Section 9.1: extend production
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 171] If header grammar
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 7] Example for PROPFIND/allprop missing
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 171] If header grammar
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 186] opaquelocktoken appendix
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 172] Whether to obsolete 'opaquelocktoken', keep it, or remove it
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 174] Terminology in 4.4: "namespace name in scope"
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 95] possible LOCK response codes
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 171] If header grammar
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 95] possible LOCK response codes
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 48] XML extensibility description
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 48] XML extensibility description
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 94] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 94] COPY and the Overwrite Header vs
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 93] Write Locks and Collections vs MOVE
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 93] Write Locks and Collections vs MOVE
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 28] MOVE vs live properties
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 28] MOVE vs live properties
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 28] MOVE vs live properties
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 51] Property behaviour upon COPY vs "remote COPY"
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 7] Example for PROPFIND/allprop missing
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 7] Example for PROPFIND/allprop missing
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 173] Info about <location> inside multistatus lost
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 47] 3xx in multistatus
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 172] Whether to obsolete 'opaquelocktoken', keep it, or remove it
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 172] Whether to obsolete 'opaquelocktoken', keep it, or remove it
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 47] 3xx in multistatus
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 47] 3xx in multistatus
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 9] XML namespace discussion
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ...
Julian Reschke
Tuesday, 29 November 2005
Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ...
Wilfredo Sánchez Vega
Re: [Fwd: Re: PUT vs strong ETags]
Lisa Dusseault
Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ...
Lisa Dusseault
[Fwd: Re: PUT vs strong ETags]
Julian Reschke
Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ...
Wilfredo Sánchez Vega
Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ...
Lisa Dusseault
Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ...
Julian Reschke
[Bug 85] clarification of live property behaviour vs namespace ops needed
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Re: Agenda for 11/30 telecon
Julian Reschke
Agenda for 11/30 telecon
Elias Sinderson
[Bug 11] Protection against XML Denial Of Service attacks
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 13] new ETag requirements
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ...
Julian Reschke
Monday, 28 November 2005
Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ...
Lisa Dusseault
Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ...
Julian Reschke
Sunday, 27 November 2005
Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ...
Cullen Jennings
[Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 10] Round-tripping namespace decls in properties
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ...
Julian Reschke
Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ...
Cullen Jennings
[Bug 99] Risks Connected with Lock Tokens
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 8] Section 9.1: extend production
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 8] Section 9.1: extend production
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 201] New: LWS allowed in Coded-URL
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Saturday, 26 November 2005
Re: [Bug 73] "Changes" section missing
Lisa Dusseault
[Bug 73] "Changes" section missing
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 188] PROPFIND include-dead-props
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 73] "Changes" section missing
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 73] "Changes" section missing
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Proposed changes
Julian Reschke
[Bug 171] If header grammar
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 200] New: remove "bis" compliance class
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 199] New: Front matter editorial nits
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Re: [Bug 184] New: Section 19.8 added with no open issue nor WG consensus
Julian Reschke
Re: ETags, next call, was: Notes on call from today ...
Julian Reschke
[Bug 51] Property behaviour upon COPY vs "remote COPY"
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 93] Write Locks and Collections vs MOVE
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 8] Section 9.1: extend production
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 8] Section 9.1: extend production
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 67] non-ASCII characters
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 38] RFC2396bis update
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 38] RFC2396bis update
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 36] Appendix numbering
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 34] property "URI"
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 29] refreshing locks
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 20] lock token example
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 19] DAV:no-lock
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 14] new requirements on ETags vs property changes
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Friday, 25 November 2005
[Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 60] If header evaluation when?
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 50] Property teminology inconsistent with RFC3253
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 18] no record of consensus for force-authenticate
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 73] "Changes" section missing
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 62] href format
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 40] Definition of "null resource" gone
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 13] new ETag requirements
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
Re: Issues for 11/25 Conference Call (notes)
Elias Sinderson
[Bug 86] DAV header definitions should use RFC3864 templates
bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu
[Bug 50] Property teminology inconsistent with RFC3253