W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 21:55:04 +0100
Message-ID: <43A086A8.4030807@gmx.de>
To: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
CC: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org

Lisa Dusseault wrote:
> Well, I disagree with that model.  I propose that all methods work the 
> same on all bindings to a resource with respect to requiring the lock 
> token, including DELETE.

Hm. Trying to clarify...: are you also opposed to distinguish between 
resources being locked and URLs being protected? Or is this terminology 
you agree with that we can use in our discussions?

Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2005 21:03:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:11 GMT