Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings from Julian Reschke on 2005-12-14 (w3c-dist-auth@w3.org from October to December 2005)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 21:55:04 +0100
To: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
CC: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Message-ID: <43A086A8.4030807@gmx.de>

Lisa Dusseault wrote:
> Well, I disagree with that model.  I propose that all methods work the 
> same on all bindings to a resource with respect to requiring the lock 
> token, including DELETE.

Hm. Trying to clarify...: are you also opposed to distinguish between 
resources being locked and URLs being protected? Or is this terminology 
you agree with that we can use in our discussions?

Best regards, Julian

Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2005 21:03:37 UTC