W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: [Bug 20] lock token example

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 17:46:56 +0200
Message-ID: <435275F0.2030806@gmx.de>
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org

bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu wrote:
> http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20
> 
> lisa@osafoundation.org changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>              Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
> 
> 
> 
> ------- Additional Comments From lisa@osafoundation.org  2005-10-15 16:34 -------
> I think I've got all the strays now, in the text for -08.
 > ...

This doesn't look like an improvement -- the spec now uses syntactically 
invalid tokens in the "opaquelocktoken" scheme.

Could you please make sure that the spec always uses registered URI 
schemes, and when doing so, uses URIs that are actually syntactically legal?


Best regards, Julian
Received on Sunday, 16 October 2005 15:47:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:10 GMT