W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: [Bug 190] New: HTTP examples using RFC2629 markup

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 18:51:54 +0100
Message-ID: <4385FDBA.5090500@gmx.de>
To: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
CC: webdav WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>

Lisa Dusseault wrote:
> Oops, wrote this up yesterday when I posted an interim version of the 
> draft, but forgot to hit 'send'.
> ...
> I ended up not using this diff because I got distracted making other 
> changes before remembering this diff.   However, I did find it useful to 
> refer to, to see exactly what you had in mind.

Well, at some point we should figure out a way how to coordinate edits.

> The removal of subsections was not a conversion error originally but an 
> editorial choice, deeming that inlined short examples can sometimes be 
> good for readability.  Nevertheless, I can go back to using subsections 
> for every example, but in that case there are more examples (the example 
> of using a precondition code in a 403 Forbidden was the first such one 
> in 08) which are new, and which should also be sections on their own if 
> that's our choice.

I'm not sure what you're referring to; the draft as of this morning (my 
time) has the subsections back in.

> Also note I indented some of the examples less as I went along -- 
> consistently going for indentation of 2 spaces from the normal edge of 
> text, and 2 spaces for each XML structural indentation.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 24 November 2005 17:53:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:11 GMT