W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2005

[Bug 29] refreshing locks

From: <bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:34:30 -0800
Message-Id: <200511152334.jAFNYUek013792@ietf.cse.ucsc.edu>
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org

http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29

lisa@osafoundation.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED



------- Additional Comments From lisa@osafoundation.org  2005-11-15 15:34 -------
Note that this isn't quite the same meaning -- it is explicit that a server
doesn't have to accept the Timeout value in the lock refresh request.  However
since timeouts chosen by clients have always been advisory, I believe this is
correct anyway.  The proposed text will be in 08.



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2005 23:34:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:11 GMT