W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2005

[Bug 29] refreshing locks

From: <bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:34:30 -0800
Message-Id: <200511152334.jAFNYUek013792@ietf.cse.ucsc.edu>
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org


lisa@osafoundation.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

------- Additional Comments From lisa@osafoundation.org  2005-11-15 15:34 -------
Note that this isn't quite the same meaning -- it is explicit that a server
doesn't have to accept the Timeout value in the lock refresh request.  However
since timeouts chosen by clients have always been advisory, I believe this is
correct anyway.  The proposed text will be in 08.

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2005 23:34:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:33 UTC