Re: Question on bug 15

+1 for proposal 1.
-1 for proposal 2.

back to lurking...

-Joe

Geoffrey M Clemm wrote on 11/23/2005 12:10:
> I agree with Stefan that we should stay consistent (i.e. +1
> for Proposal 1).
> 
> Cheers,
> Geoff
> 
> 
> Stefan wrote on 11/23/2005 01:10:28 PM:
>> Am 23.11.2005 um 19:05 schrieb Cullen Jennings:
>>
>>>
>>> I am going to call consensus on this one in a week so give me your 
>>> input
>>> before then....
>>>
>>> The basic issue is that the names are sort of reverse what people 
> think
>>> because they are based on post conditions. ACL (and others) already 
>>> exists
>>> and do it the reverse way. The question is we should we define future 
>>> stuff
>>> in the "forward" way...
>>>
>>> Proposal 1: Stay consistent with ACL - put in note for implementers 
>>> that
>>> points out this is reverse of what they might expect.
>> +1.
>>
>>> Proposal 2: Switch the way we do it. Leave old document reverse and 
>>> make new
>>> documents forward.
>> -1.
>>
>>
> 

Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2005 22:33:22 UTC