Re: [Bug 12] Destination header "consistent"

On 10/28/05 8:24 PM, "Geoffrey M Clemm" <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> 
> +1 for either Jim's suggested text or saying nothing,
> and +1 that we then close this issue.
> 
> Cheers, 
> Geoff 

So I am a client implementer, should I do anything with the Location header
in a 207 or should I just always ignore it?

Received on Sunday, 30 October 2005 19:53:23 UTC