W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2005

[Bug 200] remove "bis" compliance class

From: <bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu>
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 08:33:52 -0800
Message-Id: <200512101633.jBAGXqbV009204@ietf.cse.ucsc.edu>
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org

http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200





------- Additional Comments From julian.reschke@greenbytes.de  2005-12-10 08:33 -------
I'm not sure with whom I'm disagreeing here, but anyway..:

Should there be use case where a client needs to discover upfront whether the
server claims to comply with -bis, I'd agree. Please provide this use case.

Furthermore, *if* we keep the new compliance class, it should definitively use a
different name, such as "rev2" or "rfcxxxx" (where xxxx is the RFC number we'll
get).




------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Received on Saturday, 10 December 2005 16:34:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:11 GMT