W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: [Bug 17] XML NS terminology

From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 15:44:39 -0800
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
CC: WebDav <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BF8A9AE7.5D5BD%fluffy@cisco.com>

On 10/30/05 2:57 PM, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:

> Cullen Jennings wrote:
>> On 10/27/05 11:21 AM, "Elias Sinderson" <elias@cse.ucsc.edu> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> I am okay with the change, below.
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> Elias
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Julian Reschke wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> For the record, the change is:
>>>> Section 8., para. 61:
>>>> OLD:
>>>>    This example also demonstrates the use of XML namespace scoping and
>>>>    the default namespace.  Since the "xmlns" attribute does not contain
>>>>    a prefix, the namespace applies by default to all enclosed elements.
>>>>    Hence, all elements which do not explicitly state the namespace to
>>>>    which they belong are members of the "DAV:" namespace schema.
>>>> 
>>>> NEW:
>>>>    This example also demonstrates the use of XML namespace scoping and
>>>>    the default namespace.  Since the "xmlns" attribute does not contain
>>>>    a prefix, the namespace applies by default to all enclosed elements.
>>>>    Hence, all elements which do not explicitly state the namespace to
>>>>    which they belong are members of the "DAV:" namespace.
>> 
>> 
>> Uh, I'm probably blind, but what is the difference from the old to the new?
> 
> Last sentence, last word.
> 
> Best regards, Julian

Gotit - thanks - I looked at that about 10 times before I sent my email.
Received on Sunday, 30 October 2005 23:44:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:11 GMT