http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179 lisa@osafoundation.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From lisa@osafoundation.org 2005-12-30 16:15 ------- The text that the no-lock is not special was already in the main If header section text, but I'm happy to reiterate that in the not production section. I prefer to keep the MUST language, however -- requirements are just so much clearer than descriptive statements when we're able to use them. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.Received on Saturday, 31 December 2005 00:15:11 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:12 GMT