W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2005

[Bug 179] DAV:no-lock

From: <bugzilla@soe.ucsc.edu>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 02:40:46 -0800
Message-Id: <200512311040.jBVAekhM016101@ietf.cse.ucsc.edu>
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org


julian.reschke@greenbytes.de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |
            Version|-08                         |-09

------- Additional Comments From julian.reschke@greenbytes.de  2005-12-31 02:40 -------
(now in

I still that this is the incorrect approach. Don't use RFC2119 keywords for
stuff that is a consequence from other requirements. Just explain why it follows
(if you feel that's necessary), but don't claim it's a requirement on it's own,
because that may confuse people to think that DAV:no-lock is special and
different from something like DAV:this-is-really-a-locktoken.

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Received on Saturday, 31 December 2005 10:46:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:34 UTC