W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: GULP vs RFC251bis, was: [Bug 54] Locks vs multiple bindings

From: Elias Sinderson <elias@soe.ucsc.edu>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:54:44 -0800
Message-ID: <43A0BED4.8060808@cse.ucsc.edu>
To: WebDav <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>

Julian Reschke wrote:

> Cullen Jennings wrote:
>> These are probably the wrong questions but what I am trying to do is 
>> separate this into two parts. 1 is how locks work, 2 is how we 
>> specify them in bis. On the topic of how it works, does anyone care 
>> to help me frame the
>> really key question to decide how it works?
> I think the best starting point is indeed GULP, and to let people 
> raise potential problems they see with that model. 

In the absence of any other proposed text, I tend to agree with this 
approach -- at the very least it is a good starting point for further 

Due to the editorial overhead, I am opposed to moving all of the 
normative text on locking into one place, however desireable that may be 
otherwise. As such, I'm not averse to having normative text appear in 
the to-be-added discussion of the locking model that WebDAV employs.

Received on Thursday, 15 December 2005 00:55:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:34 UTC