Re: [Bug 19] DAV:no-lock

Ok, will do.

Lisa

On Oct 18, 2005, at 1:30 PM, Jim Whitehead wrote:

> I agree with Julian's suggested text change ("will never match" 
> instead of "must never match").
>
> - Jim
>
>
> On Oct 18, 2005, at 12:13 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>
>>
>> Lisa Dusseault wrote:
>>
>>> What about changing it to a MUST?  That makes it even more clear 
>>> (and  we will get complaints about lower-case 'must' in the text)
>>>
>>
>> Again: this follows by definition (only an IETF document/activity cab 
>> put things into the DAV: namespace, thus a URI using the DAV: scheme 
>> never can identify a valid lock token).
>>
>> Furthermore, keep in mind that RFC2119 explicitly asks for using 
>> capitalized words sparingly.
>>
>> Best regards, Julian
>>
>

Received on Wednesday, 19 October 2005 19:29:28 UTC